K180
  • Home
  • THE STREETS
    • Ealing Street Ministry
    • Euro Street Teams >
      • Belgium
      • Czech Republic
      • France
      • Hungary
      • Iceland
      • Italy
      • North Macedonia
      • Slovenia
      • Spain
      • UK
      • Ukraine
    • London GO
    • Help Train Your Church
  • Evangelists
    • BEHOLD Europe
    • Emerging Evangelists' Institute >
      • Academy of Evangelism Russia
      • EEI Scotland
      • EEI UK
      • Eldhugar Iceland
      • Messenger Network Italy
      • PN Germany
      • RedTimoteo
      • Albania
      • Lisbon
    • K-Accelerate
    • Kschool 2021
    • Kschool
    • Music
    • Faith & Film Blog
    • Resources
    • Recursos - en español
    • Risorse - in italiano
    • Ressources - en français
    • Trainees
    • Unashamed Online
    • Unashamed Online French
    • Unashamed+
  • HistoryMakers
    • HM Overview
    • HM Online (UK)
    • Bold Obedience Walk
    • HM Europe Summit
    • Country Journeys >
      • BSL HM
      • HM Albania
      • HM Armenia
      • HM Balkans
      • HM Baltics
      • HM Belarus
      • HM Belgium
      • HM Bulgaria
      • HM Croatia & Slovenia
      • HM Czech Republic
      • HM Finland
      • HM France
      • HM Georgia
      • HM Iceland
      • HM Italy
      • HM Luxembourg
      • HM Moldova
      • HM Montenegro
      • HM North Macedonia
      • HM Poland
      • HM Romania
      • HM Russia
      • HM Serbia
      • HM Spain
      • HM Switzerland
      • HM UK
      • HM Ukraine
  • Donate
  • Store
  • About us
    • About us
    • Mission and Beliefs
    • News
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    • Scott Gentry

An Abundance of Treasure for All - National Treasure (2004)

1/18/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – National Treasure is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content from a Christian perspective, read Focus on The Family’s review from Plugged In:

https://www.pluggedin.com/movie-reviews/nationaltreasure/
 
Who would have thought that producer Jerry Bruckheimer, famed purveyor of high-octane, cinematic thrill rides such as Con Air or Top Gun, would ever turn his eye to cinema of the family friendly variety? But in the early 2000s, Bruckheimer did just that, in partnering with Disney to deliver the wildly successful, first instalment of the never-ending Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, and National Treasure – an action-adventure extravaganza. Whilst the latter draws logical comparisons to the Indiana Jones franchise, this is arguably nuttier and sillier than anything Mr. Spielberg has ever devised and put to film.

For starters, it features *the* Nicolas Cage as a ‘historian’, treasure hunter and amateur cryptologist named Ben Gates, who, throughout the course of the film, steals the Declaration of Independence (he prefers to say “borrowed”), because he believes that displayed upon it is a coded map, which will lead him to untold riches. Now if I believed in gambling, this is the sort of film in which I’d encourage people to place high bets on where they think the ridiculous, plot-by-numbers is going to take them next – for they themselves might be led to quite a treasure. And yet, in spite of the film’s various weaknesses, it frequently extolls and promotes virtues of real worth: choosing generosity over greed or being quick to forgive those who wrong you.

Perhaps the film’s most important principle, however, is that of its warning towards those who may be obsessively drawn towards treasure, or in our reality, materialism, voiced by Ben’s father, Patrick Gates (Jon Voight). As the film’s moral compass, Patrick frequently reminds Ben (and by extension, his companions) not to “waste your life” by pursuing a treasure which so many of his family’s predecessors have squandered their life searching for, thereby neglecting family and that which is generally most important in life. Of course, Ben finds a way to twist Patrick’s arm, otherwise the film’s glaring lack of adventure would be irritating, and it most certainly wouldn’t live up to its name. But Patrick’s reservations aren’t unfounded – he has a job, a house, family and responsibilities which require his attention. Unlike Ben, Patrick understands that life cannot simply be one long, obsessive treasure hunt – it isn’t at all honouring to the people around you, or yourself. In fact, it isn’t honouring to God.

The Bible teaches that humanity is not to be preoccupied or obsessed with the things of this world. Rather, we are His creation, and our eyes are to point heavenward, looking to Him for His leading and guidance for our lives here on earth. So, when we lose focus of that which is important - a relationship with the Most High God - we replace it with inferior substitutes and thereby dishonour God’s holy name. We might not ever intend to do this, but how are we to “love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your strength” (Deuteronomy 6:5, NLT) if we’re fixated on something else entirely? It simply isn’t possible. In His Word, God teaches that He is the One who alone deserves our utmost attention.

Picture
Whilst Ben Gates has no discernible faith or belief in God, the film’s screenwriters donate small sections of the film to taking the character of Ben on a journey, from being wholly obnoxious and ignorant of other people, to a place in which he discovers first-hand through the actions of his former associate, Ian Howe (Sean Bean), that the tireless pursuit of substance is entirely corruptible, when Ian betrays Ben and attempts to take his life. Throughout the film, either men’s methods of obtaining various artifacts are artfully juxtaposed against one another: Ben’s reasoning and methods for ‘borrowing’ the Declaration of Independence are honourable (he’s trying to save the artifact it from damage or destruction), whilst Ian’s is wholly criminal, exemplified in him caring very little for those who he hurts in the process, just as long as he can become rich. Such experiences lead Ben to protect others, rather than his own interests – thereby putting the discovery of the treasure at risk, but not the safety of his family and friends. He chooses not to make an idol of the treasure or his profession, and instead focusses upon that which is truly important.
 
It’s as if Ben comes to discover a sense of the biblical position upon wealth, throughout the course of the film’s story. For example, he comes to learn that there is a dangerous lure to wealth (Mark 4:19, NLT) – one which promises much in terms of materialistic contentment, but fails to mention the emotional and spiritual cost, too. Enough is never truly enough, for Ian fails to see that whilst securing the treasure for himself promises monetary gain in the immediate, he will never truly be satisfied. Money doesn’t last forever, and a desire to gain more of it will only lead Ian to steal other artifacts too. He believes that he will be satisfied if he gained more of what he is chasing, but the Bible also teaches that “Life is not measured by how much you own” (Luke 12:15, NLT). Instead, our life is measured by whether or not we can profess to belong to the One who made us. We are called by God to be in friendship with Him – who through “His divine power”, “has given us everything needed for life and godliness” (2 Peter 1:2-4, NRSV). It is in God alone, that we can have the longings of our heart fulfilled. Not in treasure, or even in the ‘good’ things of this life. No. In Him alone. For if we turn from our sin, draw near to Him in faith and live a life dedicated to Him, we can rest in the knowledge that everything we need is at hand: “God will fully satisfy every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 4:19, NRSV). Ben chose not to allow his desire for riches corrupt him, whilst Ian did not. And in the end, Ben found everything he wanted and more. But how much more does God wish to give to those who turn from their sinful ways and towards Him? So much more: His gift of salvation (the promise of eternal life in Heaven), relationship with the God of the universe and His constant presence with us, every day. Now that might not be a national treasure, but it is a worldwide treasure, on offer to all, today.
​
Picture
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch National Treasure? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about the film’s view of obtaining treasure on such a large scale – do they align more with the views of Ben or Patrick, in the pursuit of wealth? Ask them what they think of Patrick’s initial reasoning for not wanting to pursue searching for the treasure – did he have a point in regard to it becoming an unhealthy obsession? Do they believe that Ben was obsessed with finding the treasure, or was he just passionate? Should Ben have been more like Ian in his methods and reasoning to find the treasure, or was he right?
 
Later prompt them to consider their own view of possessions and wealth.
What do they believe to be the thing that brings fulfilment and happiness in their life? Go on to share that Jesus offers us all the lifesaving, life-changing gift of salvation, because God, through the sacrifice of Jesus, made a way for us to experience fulness of love, joy, hope and peace in Him – everything that humanity needs and more. But not only that, He gave us that which we cannot buy: the gift of salvation for all who repent for their sinful errors and turn to follow Him. For God wants us to be able to receive in Him all that we need (including salvation) and more, which is found in relationship with Him alone. Take the opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them – noting that God is the One we need over ‘things’, because He saves us from the grip of darkness now, but also in eternity too. Then, invite them (if you feel prompted to by God) to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
National Treasure is currently available to stream through Disney+.
 
0 Comments

God’s People of Interest - Person of Interest (2011-2016)

1/11/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – season one of Person of Interest is rated ‘15’. However, the specific episode written about below, “No Good Deed”, is rated ‘12’ (no Christian reviews are currently available for season one).
 
Yes, I can indeed confirm that this week, I have broken the sacred rules of the Faith & Film Blog in choosing to dive into a single episode of the long-running, Sci-Fi television show, Person of Interest. However, I can assure you that it was not done so without precedent. You see, whilst my family and I are lovers of cinema, we also enjoy short-form entertainment that’s quick and easy to digest, but occasionally leaves something intellectually stimulating for us to chew on – a criteria met by Person of Interest and then some.

The brainchild of Jonathan Nolan (brother to cinematic favourite Christopher Nolan), Person of Interest is a high-concept television show which artfully transcends its initially simplistic vigilante formula (think The Equalizer but more high-tech), by offering up challenging questions and entering into discussions of an ethical, philosophical and perhaps even spiritual nature…

​When described this way, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the show wasn’t especially ‘fun’, but Nolan and his creative team never forget to thrill us with countless, nail-biting scenes of hand-to-hand combat, or increasingly ridiculous feats of undercover espionage, too. At its core, however, Person of Interest tracks the adventures of John Reese (Jim Caviezel, The Passion of The Christ) and Harold Finch (Michael Emerson) - an ex-CIA operative and reclusive billionaire computer programmer, respectively. In his days as a software engineer, Finch was contracted by the United States’ government to design, build and implement technology which could detect perpetrators of acts of terrorism, before they carry them out. But with great power, comes great responsibility, and Finch predicted that the government would abuse/misuse his gift to the world. And he was right - for whilst the machine identifies those who pose a serious threat to national security by producing their social security numbers, it can also predict acts of violence committed by or against ordinary people, too. Those included within the latter category are deemed “irrelevant” by the government and cruelly left to their fate. But Finch and Reese can’t ignore the numbers and the subsequent crime statistics by simply turning a blind eye to people’s suffering. Instead, the pair team up and take a stand for the helpless, by using their very particular set of skills…
​

Picture

Generally speaking, the show is told in a simple linear structure: the machine alerts Reese and Finch to a new ‘person of interest’, the pair then investigate to determine whether they are the victim or perpetrator (easier said than done in their case), which is then closely followed by a pulse-pounding finale in which justice is neatly served with effortless cool. Such a format, whilst ultimately satisfying, could easily become tiresome, which is why Nolan intersperses the narrative with flashbacks containing information which is pivotal to the current plot, or that which develops the principal characters further. In the case of the flashbacks spread throughout “No Good Deed”, however, they serve to illuminate the show’s mantra: everyone is relevant, and everyone is worth saving.
 
The episode’s primary plot is Finch and Reese’s tailing of a spy who is currently working for the NSA and targeted for elimination. But when the spy is revealed to be coming dangerously close to discovering the Machine, it causes Finch to consider his relationship to this dangerous creation, and his once misjudged approach to the ethical implications of the work himself and his business partner, Nathan Ingram (Brett Cullen), were about to embark upon:

Ingram: (about the Machine) “Thought you would have turned this thing off by now. We turn it over (to the government) tomorrow”.
 
Finch: “I'm keeping it online as long as possible”.
 
Ingram: “The world has been spinning for 5 billion years without your machine, Harold. I'm sure it will be fine for one more night. Honestly, I'll be glad to be rid of the thing.”
 
Finch: “This ‘thing’ has already saved countless lives”.
 
Ingram: “You mean countless, relevant lives”.
 
Finch: “We had to draw the line somewhere”.
​
Ingram: “Everyone is relevant to someone”.
​
​This is one of those small, much savoured and tender character moments – one which carries on the through-line of the series’ main, thematic concern: Finch, Reese and others all desire that those who find themselves in mortal peril would be saved, because to them, these would-be victims have intrinsic worth and are valued by their families and friends. Even the villains themselves are deemed worthy of saving, which leads Reese to regularly wound, but not kill them. It’s a moving sentiment - one which the series believes wholeheartedly. It’s also one shared by God: “God wants all people to be saved. And he wants everyone to know the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4, ICB). Through sending Jesus to die for you and for me, God showed that He not only had a plan for widespread salvation, but that He had every intention of seeing it brought to fruition – the act of His children, His creation, being drawn back into friendship with Him. And this, the Bible teaches, was done out of God’s unfathomable compassion and love for people who were in need of a spiritual Saviour: “But God has shown us how much he loves us — it was while we were still sinners that Christ died for us!” (Romans 5:8, ICB).
​ 
Picture

​Even though we might not deserve God’s saving embrace or ever respond to it, Jesus still took upon himself all of our sin (the mistakes you and I have all made in God’s eyes) and destroyed its power forever, thereby making a way for us to be able to choose forgiveness, His all-embracing love and to be in friendship with Him and His Father, if we ask for it. This wasn’t completed just because He could, but because He loves us more than we can ever know. After all, a loving father would do anything to save their children from danger, wouldn’t he? And God saw that we were in dire need of being liberated – from the weight and shame of our mistakes which so often weighs us down, but also the unavoidable reality of eternal death itself. For Jesus himself once said, “unless you believe that I am who I claim to be (the Son of God), you will die in your sins” (John 8:24, NLT), and thereby become doomed to spend eternity in separation from God. But if you and I choose to follow God for the rest of our life, abandoning our wrongdoing, and “openly declare that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead”, “you will be saved” (Romans 10:9, NLT). And that’s something we can trust in completely, because Jesus has already taken the punishment which we deserved because of our sins, when He died in our place all those years ago. Today, we need only ask for the forgiveness of our sins and walk into friendship and freedom with Him.
 
So, whilst we read and know that God’s plan of salvation is perfect and ever dependable, we learn that Reese and Finch are often forced to accept that even they have limitations and sometimes fail to save those whom they care about. People die, and there’s nothing they can do about it. Even with the machine working at full force, they cannot account for stray bullets, or those who are perishing in other countries besides theirs. Yes, they might manage to save a large number of people, physically speaking, but they can’t save many or any, quite like God can, in the spiritual sense. For God tends to the evil, sick, wounded conditions of our hearts – Reese and Finch, however, can only tend to our physical wounds. Person of Interest does serve a great purpose though, in that it illuminates the truth that God deems all of us relevant and important enough to be saved, for whilst the scope of those who can be saved in this (albeit entertaining show) is limited by our defined realms of possibility, God is not limited by anything or anyone – salvation is made available to all worldwide, through Jesus, and so there is good reason for Christians to pray for those who do not yet know Him. And whilst Person of Interest and its central conceit is a work of fiction, we can tell others that God’s unwavering desire to love and save others, isn’t – for we can tell them, because of Jesus, “today is the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians 6:2, NLT).

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Person of Interest? Use the TV show’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about this episode and it’s view on people’s intrinsic sense of worth and value. Are all people worth saving? Should Jon and Finch save everyone? Ask them what they think about the line “everyone is relevant to someone” – do they agree or disagree? Do they consider themselves to be relevant or important to someone? What about to God? If they answer yes or no, on either question, ask why.  
 
Go on to discuss the lifesaving, life-changing gift of salvation which is made available to all. Say that God, through the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross, showed His great love for us, by making a way for anyone to choose to be saved from eternal destruction when they ask for forgiveness and turn from their mistakes. Emphasise that God is merciful, because we do not deserve to be forgiven and saved. But through sending Jesus to die for you, He lets us know that we are worth saving.
 
Now take the opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them - then invite them (if you feel prompted to by God) to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the episode (or entire season) for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film or TV-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this TV show, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Person of Interest – Season One, including the episode “No Good Deed”, is currently available to purchase through Amazon Prime Video. ​
​
0 Comments

Looking for Fulfilment, In All the Wrong Places – Citizen Kane (1941)

1/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘U’. For more details on the film’s content from a Christian perspective, read Movie Guide’s review: https://www.movieguide.org/reviews/citizen-kane.html
 
Mr. Bernstein: “There's a lot of statues in Europe you haven't bought yet.”
 
Charles Foster Kane: “You can't blame me. They've been making statues for some two thousand years, and I've only been collecting for five.”
 
As the first Faith & Film blog post of 2021, dear readers, I must begin as I mean to go on - telling the truth no matter the cost. So, I have a confession to make: Previous to writing this article, I had never seen the ‘cinematic landmark’ that is Citizen Kane. For years, I’ve carried this fact as a sort of low-level secret shame when interacting with fellow film buffs. It’s utterly ridiculous I know, since all it means is that I haven’t seen what is frequently touted as being the ‘greatest film of all time’. But when you put it like that, perhaps it’s indeed right to call into question my credibility as a film enthusiast – but that’s ultimately for you to decide in the comments below. However, such shame no longer has a hold over me, as I recently dedicated a wintery afternoon to immersing myself in the remarkable, if troubling excess of Kane’s mansion Xanadu, and the startling relevance of comments made regarding the importance of integrity in journalism, and the validity of always printing objective truth amongst the headlines. The star of the show, however, was of course Kane himself, played with steely determination by Orson Welles. Larger-than-life and ultimately a tragic character, Kane possesses a “longing”, “hungry soul” described in Psalm 107:9 (NKJV), which led me to reflect on the only One who can satisfy a person’s deepest longings: Jesus Christ.

Kane was dead, to begin with. Yes, the death and final word uttered by the publishing tycoon Charles Foster Kane, acts as the catalyst for the events of Citizen Kane - a sweeping story which spends the majority of its runtime investigating this wealthy, but lonesome man. Through interviews conducted with some of those closest to Kane, an eager reporter desperately seeks to decipher his final word, “Rosebud”. And in so doing, he learns that Kane himself, whilst he had everything a person could wish for, might have in fact yearned for something more entirely…
 
So, whilst Citizen Kane begins as a sensational tale about the wonders available to those with untold riches and seemingly limitless fame, it gradually becomes a cautionary tale to those who so idolise living a life of excess - one that responsibly communicates its dangers rather than luxuriate in its many pleasures, unlike other films of the same ilk. For instance, the eponymous Kane inherits a gold mine at the age of 25, immediately making him one of the richest men in the world. He subsequently uses his fortune to take possession of the New York Enquirer, mount a political career, purchase countless antiques and artifacts, but also control those around him to satisfy his own desires. It’s in the film’s final third that Kane’s older self begins to closely resemble the later years of King Solomon, and specifically his writings within Ecclesiastes. In Ecclesiastes 2:10 (ICB), Solomon reflects upon his exploits thusly: “Anything I saw and wanted, I got for myself. I did not miss any pleasure I desired. I was pleased with everything I did. And this pleasure was the reward for all my hard work.” Kane did all of this and more, but later experiences bitter dissatisfaction just as Solomon did: “But then I looked at what I had done. I thought about all the hard work. Suddenly I realized it was just a waste of time, like chasing the wind! There is nothing to gain from anything we do here on earth.” (Ecclesiastes 2:11, ICB). When Kane experiences a great many losses, he retreats to his kingdom-like residence of Xanadu, a vast estate in Florida, with but himself and the servants for company. He has everything, and yet he has nothing – no friends, family or colleagues to enjoy his vast fortune with. Instead, he secretly longs to return to a life of simplicity and meagreness, visualised in a flashback to his childhood in which all that he owned was a snow sled, but was joyful regardless of his circumstances.
​
Picture
​
​I felt and understood Kane’s crushing loneliness – to some extent, at least. Whilst I have never and will never be able to boast about owning a newspaper, or gold mine, I too have owned possessions which made me feel as if I didn’t need anything else, that everything I ever needed and wanted surrounded me already – whether it be romantic relationships, financial security etc. And yet, there came a time in which I realised that the great value I placed upon people and possessions in my life, was in fact misguided. Deep down, I was ignoring the fact that I still yearned for something more – I wasn’t complete! But whilst Kane desired a return to the simpler, innocent, yet completely unobtainable time in his childhood, I was unknowingly searching and longing for a connection to my creator. Thankfully, a friend pointed me towards God as being the One alone who could give to me all that I needed – salvation and a relationship with Him. So, I reached out to God in prayer, asked for forgiveness from my mistakes and to be given a friendship with Jesus. And it was only then, that I was given an overwhelming sense of peace and fulfilment in my heart which I had tried to gain for myself, for so long. I not only knew that I was forgiven, but that I now had everything I needed: forgiveness, salvation and a relationship with my creator God. A gap or hole in my heart had now been filled, thanks to Jesus and His uniquely redemptive power.

 
Such a moment revealed to me that both myself and Kane were lied to. We never needed more ‘stuff’ or ‘things’ to be fulfilled. All we needed was a relationship with the One who made us, in order to be truly fulfilled and saved. For God has designed us in such a way, that we are inbuilt with a desire to find everything that we need in Him. And it is in Him alone that we find salvation from the grip of sin and darkness in our lives: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God — not the result of works, so that no one may boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9, NRSV). It is in Him that we find an ever-present Father who cares for us: “The Lord is my rock, my fortress, and my Saviour; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.” (Psalm 18:2, NLT). It is in close friendship with Him, that we quickly come to realise that what we really need is God – before all of the possessions, wealth, relationships… Etc. 


For the Bible teaches plainly, noted by Jesus himself: “It is worth nothing for a person to have the whole world, if he loses his soul.” (Mark 8:36, ICB). For whilst we can have anything and everything we want in this life, Kane’s end shows that a life like his is soulless, and we leave behind all that we accumulate on this earth when we die. But we need Jesus above all things, for He is the One alone who can give to us the gift of eternal life after we die on this earth. We cannot buy or gift it to ourselves so liberally, as Kane did with his art collection. No. For each and every one of us, the Bible teaches, has done wrong in God’s eyes and do not deserve to be forgiven: “The (just) payment for sin is death” (Romans 6:23, ICB). But the Good News is that we need not live an empty life and enter into a hellish existence after we die. For God has made a way for us to be rescued through Jesus Christ: “God did not send his Son into the world to judge the world guilty, but to save the world through him.” (John 3:17, ICB). Through Jesus’ death on the cross and subsequent resurrection, we have access to the gracious, undeserved gift of God which is forgiveness and salvation from our sins. It is only accessible through Jesus (Acts 4:12), but it is on offer to all today. And if we accept Him into our lives, we will have a palpable, ever-present sense of love, joy, hope and peace which comes from Him alone. Far better then, is it to accept Christ, than to accept the worldview and lifestyle of one Charles Foster Kane.
​
Picture

​Challenge:

 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Citizen Kane? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about the film’s view of amassing great wealth – is it good or bad? Healthy or unhealthy? Ask them what they think was the reason for Kane’s downfall. Why do they think he is unhappy and lost, towards the end of the film?
Do they believe that a person can be truly happy through having all the possessions they could want, or are other things more important?
​
Prompt them to consider Kane’s loneliness – everybody leaves him when he becomes obsessed with ‘things’ and treats those closest to him as such. Do they think it’s possible that he could find happiness elsewhere? Go on to discuss the lifesaving, life-changing gift of salvation, saying that God, through the sacrifice of Jesus, showed His love for us, to make a way so that nobody would have to live apart from Him in hell, for eternity. Instead, God wants us to be able to come to Him for what we need, so we might enter into relationship and eternity with Him. Take the opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them – noting that God is the One we need over ‘things’, because He saves us from the grip of darkness now, but also in eternity too. Then, invite them (if you feel prompted to by God) to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Citizen Kane is currently available to stream through BBC iPlayer (UK only).
​
0 Comments

A New Heart, Not A Fix-Up - How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000)

12/14/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Christian Spotlight On Entertainment’s review:

https://christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2000/howthegrinchstolechristmas.html  
 
The Grinch (Jim Carrey): “Max! Help me! I'm feeling!”
 
In my household, I make no apology for the fact that I prefer my Christmas films to be a little darker in tone, and anarchic in nature. For example, I adore the mean-spirited mania of Joe Dante’s Gremlins – a welcome antidote to the saccharine festive offerings we’ve come to expect from Hollywood. But each year, my family will only humour me for so long, as they often need A Charlie Brown Christmas to come along and lift our spirits too (it is the season of hope and goodwill, after all). On all of our Christmas film nights, however, I try to meet them in the middle when we’re selecting a festive film to watch. And Ron Howard’s How the Grinch Stole Christmas is that middle ground, striking an almost perfect balance between simultaneously revelling in gleeful hatred for the season, and falling head over heels in love with its message too. But more importantly, seeing as Jesus is the reason for the season, is it one of those mainstream films which covertly features Christian themes within? Not exactly…
 
The inimitable Jim Carrey stars as the Grinch, a cantankerous, reclusive creature who lives on Mount Crumpit with Max, a canine, and his only companion. His cave looms large over Whoville, a place of joy for many, but only despair for the Grinch. For he is an orphan, but also a peculiar looking individual, which made him the source of much ridicule for the people of Whoville throughout his childhood. Ostracised from the townspeople, the Grinch decided to place himself in a self-imposed exile, thinking he will be better off alone. But when Christmas comes around however, the Grinch simply cannot stand the merrymaking – the townspeople’s singing reaches him even all the way up at Mount Crumpit! Enraged, the Grinch concocts a plan to crush the Whos Christmas spirit, by stealing all of their presents, decorations and food while they're sleeping. But a chance meeting with the innocent, idealistic Cindy Lou Who, leads the Grinch to wonder whether his cold, ‘two sizes too small’ heart, might become a warmer, larger one instead…

Predictably, How the Grinch Stole Christmas becomes a redemption narrative – much like A Christmas Carol. It’s an encouraging tale of radical transformation, in which the blackest, most seemingly irredeemable of hearts, is set free of the darkness which permeated it so. But whilst A Christmas Carol posits that one’s evil behaviour may be altered of their own free will, How the Grinch Stole Christmas (almost) gets to the, ahem, heart of the issues so affecting the Grinch’s life. Unlike the source material (which leaves the reasoning for the Grinch’s actions ambiguous), Ron Howard’s film adaptation explains that the Grinch’s heart has hardened because he has never experienced love as one should. He is an orphan, who was mistreated for being different and unloved by the world around him. His anger towards others and hatred for the most joyful of seasons, derives from the sad occurrences which happened to him, his own mistakes and the fact that he hasn’t dealt with the hatred in his heart.
 
One could say that the Grinch suffers from an orphan heart, and that all he needs to be made whole is find loving acceptance from people and realise that the reason for the season is showing goodwill towards others, sharing and being part of a community – even an imperfect one such as his. But the Bible teaches that the Grinch’s issues cannot be solved by the world around him. In fact, no amount of human care and attention, or sheer determination to change one’s ways will solve the issues within the Grinch’s heart. No, the Grinch’s issues stem from the condition of his heart – not in the physical sense, but he has a spiritual issue that no amount of festive cheer or acceptance from others, will fix.
​
Picture

​It’s within our innermost being that our emotions and desires dwell – otherwise known as our heart. But God teaches in his word, the Bible, that our hearts are faulty. For internally, we are filled with darkness: “The human heart is the most deceitful of all things, and desperately wicked. Who really knows how bad it is?” (Jeremiah 17:9, NLT). Since the day humankind first decided to do wrong in Gods eyes (thereby sinning against Him), the darkness which comes about because of sin has entered into our world like a sickness, poisoning everything that was once good – including the human race. It means that our lives have been corrupted by sin – even our emotions and desires. Jesus knew this, and specifically spoke on the state of our hearts: For from within, out of a person’s heart, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, wickedness, deceit, lustful desires, envy, slander, pride, and foolishness.  All these vile things come from within; they are what defile you.” (Mark 7:21-23, NLT). And so, it is the same with the Grinch – for his evil actions and hatred comes from within, and so too does his longing for connection and love. But when we do wrong in the eyes of our creator, sin and darkness breaks apart the connection we’re intended to have with him. The Grinch is not only an orphan in the worldly sense, but the spiritual also. And we are also cut off from God.
 
However, the film (and original book) doesn’t reach this epiphany. Rather, upon hearing the Whos rejoicing in song with one another, despite them having had their Christmas literally snatched away from them, the Grinch comes to understand that “Christmas doesn’t come from a store”, and “perhaps…means a little bit more”. It’s then that the Grinch’s heart begins to grow, and he determines to become a new man. And so, the film’s meaning of Christmas is revealed: We save ourselves and one another, from our cantankerous, evil ways, teaching one another and learning to prioritise loving each other, instead of being preoccupied by materialism. But the Grinch hasn’t at all dealt with the root of his anger, hatred and pain. He has simply self-medicated, through responding to the Whos appeal to embrace the better side of our human condition. But as we have read, however, that isn’t always possible – darkness still stems from our very hearts and affects the way in which we live our lives.

Picture

​No, the Grinch’s only hope for true, lasting change (and ours too), is by seeking a transplant of the heart – rejecting the evil within, and embracing the cleansing power of God instead, which alone makes us righteous people and deals with even the darkest area of our hearts. And we do this by coming before Jesus and prayerfully asking for His forgiveness, which was made available to all, because of what He did for us on the Cross, 2,000 years ago. For “everyone has sinned” and fallen “short of God’s glorious standard” (Romans 3:23, NLT) due to the way in which we have lived our lives. And as a result, we need fixing. For if we don’t receive that heart transplant, we will only be caught in sin’s binding grip, eventually receiving “the wages of sin (which) is death” (Romans 6:23, NLT) for all of eternity – separation from God as punishment for our sins.
 
But God, through the work of His Son Jesus Christ, offers a once-and-for-all heart transplant today. For if we acknowledge our wrongdoing and turn from it, we can be forgiven and enter into an eternal friendship with God. And this was made possible by God when He sent His Son to pay the price which we owed to Him, in giving His life for us on the Cross, where He was brutally crucified as the “…offering for our sin”, so “that we could be made right with God through Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:21, NLT), and avoid eternal death. And so, if we ask for His forgiveness and choose to obediently follow God for the remainder of our days here on Earth, He promises He will: “give you a new heart” and “put a new spirit in you”, removing a “stony, stubborn heart” to “give you a tender, responsive heart” instead (Ezekiel 36:26, NLT). It’s an offer that is available to all today (even the grinchiest among us), enabling those who respond, to live in freedom from the weight of sin, with everlasting joy, hope, love and peace – not just that which we find at Christmas time.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch How the Grinch Stole Christmas? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about the film’s understanding of what it means to have a heart – is that where our sense of goodness comes from? Can it be ‘enlarged’, just as the Grinch’s was, filled with goodness? Ask them what they think is the reason for the darkness which overflows within the Grinch’s heart. Is anyone truly to blame for the way he acts, or is he alone responsible for the way in which he reacts to the situations he is faced with?
​
Prompt them to consider the state of the Grinch’s heart – do they think it’s possible that a heart be can be changed with the ease shown in the film? Go on to discuss the lifesaving, life-changing gift of salvation, saying that God, through the sacrifice of Jesus, showed His love for us, to make a way so that nobody would have to live apart from Him in hell, for eternity. Instead, God is in the business of making hearts clean, so we might enter into relationship and eternity with Him. Take the opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them – noting that God is the One alone who cleans us up and saves us from the grip of darkness now, but also in eternity too. Then, invite them (if you feel prompted to by God) to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
How the Grinch Stole Christmas is now available to rent through YouTube and Amazon Prime Video.
​
0 Comments

Salvation According To Dickens - Disney's A Christmas Carol (2009)

12/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Christian Spotlight On Entertainment’s review:
https://christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2009/christmascarol2009.html

Fred (Colin Firth): “There are many things from which I have derived good and have not profited. Christmas being among them. But I have always thought of Christmas as a kind, charitable time. The only time when men open their shut-up hearts and think of all people as fellow travellers to the grave and not some other race of creatures bound on other journeys. And therefore, Uncle, although it has never put a scrap of gold or silver in my pocket, I believe it has done me good, and I say, God bless it!”
​

In February of 1978, famed music journalist Greil Marcus described Al Green’s The Belle Album as carrying “a sense of liberation and purpose deep enough to make the sinner envy the saved”. Forty-two years on, Marcus puts into words so eloquently, the exact way I feel towards 2009’s A Christmas Carol. This visually striking adaptation of the Charles Dickens literary classic is by no means perfect and was met with only faint praise upon its release. Yet, I have always found there to be something so undeniably true in Ebenezer Scrooge’s ‘conversion’ story, albeit an ostensibly secular one, that I have been drawn back to it annually from the moment I first laid my eyes upon it. Yes, this is a tale comprised of motifs which feel as old as time itself, but regardless of however many adaptations we might see of it, or how many times I watch it with my family, this rendition will forever remind me of the spiritual encounter I had and continue to have, with the living God.

In this largely faithful adaptation, Jim Carrey stars as the miserly, inconsiderate self-absorbed businessman Ebenezer Scrooge, who has mostly withdrawn from society, reappearing only to terrorise the poor into paying that which he is due. One could be forgiven for loathing Scrooge, but I can’t honestly help but pity this frail, dejected curmudgeon. His once bright prospects as a young businessman and husband have long since disappeared, leaving him alone with only a hardened heart and the money that he has hoarded for himself. Regardless of whether he would admit it or not, I have always felt that Scrooge ultimately seeks salvation. He is miserable, but perhaps seems aware that his ostracization is of his own doing – initially a positive result for this seemingly heartless recluse. The process of confronting the weight of his mistakes, in order to be set free however, appears too demanding and agonizing. He is, in a sense, representative of us all when we choose rebellion against God instead of embracing the cure for eternal death, that is Jesus Christ.

Throughout the film, we watch as the Ghosts of Christmas lead him to revisit the most painful, regrettable moments of his life – from idolising money over loving his fiancé as he should, to hardening his heart in the face of the poor and needy, who require aid. It’s a process throughout which I found myself strangely mourning for him, regardless of whether he was embittered by the hand that life dealt him, or simply chose to be and was therefore unable to see what he had become. What remained clear to me throughout, however, is that we too are able to call to mind a series of events which we regret, just as Scrooge does. For human fallibility is unavoidable, as the Apostle Paul teaches: “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23, NRSV). The Bible teaches that humankind’s inherent nature is to rebel against God and make mistakes (deliberately or otherwise), witnessed in the Garden of Eden and beyond. In fact, as Scrooge trudges through the cold, harsh streets, we see that he is completely unaware of the pain he is causing those around him, which reminded of a Psalm of David: “But who can detect their errors? Clear me from hidden faults.” (Psalm 19:12, NRSV). Before coming to Christ, the Bible teaches that we are blind to every single one of our sins, and are, in almost all cases, content to be so. But the sins we commit also form a blockage between us and our Creator, preventing us from seeing Him, receiving His gift of friendship and eternal salvation.
​
Picture

​Intriguingly, however, this adaptation drives home the crushing reality of sin. Like the Bible teaches, the film posits that Scrooge is in dire need of liberation from the invisible chains of sin which so often bind us and lead to hell. For if he doesn’t change, Scrooge will receive “…the wages of sin (which are) death” (Romans 6:23, NIV), and he will not only experience physical death therefore, but a spiritual one too. So, his one chance of receiving salvation comes in the form of a visitor from beyond the grave - a former business partner named Jacob Marley, who warns him that he now “wears the chains he forged in life” and are symbolic of his sin. The length and weight of Scrooge’s chains are left ambiguous, but I believe it to have been a conscious decision on the part of Dickens, in order to illustrate that his own is, frighteningly, longer and far weightier than his former partner’s.

And so, Marley’s introduction sequence shocks me into looking back upon my life to ask, have I actually spent it well? It’s even led me to wonder if am in fact a ‘good’ person. As if God hadn’t already given me enough to consider, Jacob Marley also takes a moment to furiously lament the misuse of the gift which was his life. “I was blind! Blind! I could not see my own life, squandered and misused! Oh, woe… OH, WOE IS ME!” he wails. Knowing that separation from God for eternity is biblically described as the punishment for sin, this moment helped imagined for me what it must be like now for the deceased who, like me, were once tragically and blissfully unaware of their impending fate. Eternal death and hell became a reality for me whilst watching that very sequence. For Marley’s speech indicates that hell is “a place of suffering”, where its guilty inhabitants are sentenced to be “separated from God’s mercy and blessing” and instead receive a fate that is “final and fixed” (Rico Tice, Honest Evangelism: How to Talk About Jesus Even When It’s Tough, Pg. 36-37). Jesus affirms this when He taught in the book of Luke that between Him and the guilty, “a great chasm has been fixed” and therefore “no one can cross from there to us” (Luke 16:26, NRSV).

Understandably, Marley’s harsh warning left Scrooge and I feeling visibly shaken. And as if that wasn’t enough to persuade him to change his ways, the story introduces Scrooge to the first of three more spirits who appears curiously in the form of a candle, possessing a star for a flame and a cap to extinguish its light. Upon his arrival, the room is instantly illuminated, as the being’s “crown sprung a bright clear jet of light”. Blinded by or perhaps fearful of the light, Scrooge begs him to be covered, to which the ghost asks, “would you so soon put out, with worldly hands, the light I give?” It’s almost impossible not to be reminded of Jesus in these moments, especially when the ghost informs him that he is there for Scrooge’s “reclamation”. For an element of Jesus’ God-given purpose is to illuminate the darkness that lives within us - those who are oblivious or ignorant to the perfect light which He gives. In 1 John, the author argues that for us to claim that we are in friendship “with Him while we are walking in darkness, we lie and do not do what is true” (1 John 1:6, NRSV). No, in order for you and me to be a friend and disciple of God, our inherent brokenness must be addressed. The truth has to be brought to His perfect light, one which is naturally intense and beyond comparison. It could very well blind us, but just as Scrooge nervously chooses to embrace the light and his invitation to examine his life, warts-and-all, I too made that decision. For Scrooge, the spirit offers his hand towards him as a friend would and so too does Christ.
​
Picture

​In receiving it, Scrooge is treated to a literal, “heavenly perspective of man’s world” - one “not many mortals are granted”. But it is also figurative, in the the sense he has been given an unlikely opportunity to have the error of his ways revealed and avoid the same fate as his business partner. And God, through the work of His Son Jesus Christ, offers that opportunity to us today. In spite of our ignorance, God implores us to acknowledge our sin for what it is and to turn from it, made possible by sending His Son to pay the price which humanity owed, when He gave His life for us on the Cross. He was brutally crucified on the cross as the “…offering for our sin”, so “that we could be made right with God through Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:21, NLT), and avoid eternal death.

In accepting that we are flawed and in need of salvation isn’t easy but doing so not only saved me from a hellish eternal existence and opened me up to the possibility that I could be better than the worst offence I have ever committed. Through doing so, Scrooge’s entire outlook on life was forever changed and so was mine. Suddenly, Scrooge didn’t want to ignore the needy or misuse his power (much to the confusion of society). And whilst Scrooge’s story is a work of fiction, to God, such a process is entirely possible. For Him, if we accept Christ into our lives and turn from our sin, we “are a new creation” whose old lives have “passed away” and “become new”, as it written in 2 Corinthians 5:17 (NRSV). It is now impossible to watch A Christmas Carol without shedding tears of joy alongside Scrooge, which in turn propels me to share of my liberation from the chains of sin and encourage more non-Christians to experience this film, so that they too might envy the saved just as I did.
 
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Disney’s A Christmas Carol for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about the film’s understanding of what it means to be good – can someone as evil as Scrooge truly change their ways, or is the film just full of wishful thinking? Ask them whether they consider Scrooge’s actions to as bad as the film does – does he deserve to be as unhappy as Marley after death? Or do they think that even he deserves a second chance?
​
Prompt them to consider Scrooge’s wrongdoing and how Marley says it will weigh upon him more heavily in eternity – do they think that they are perhaps forming a chain in their life today? Go on to breach the subject of salvation, saying that God, through the sacrifice of Jesus, showed His love for us for us and that he didn’t want anyone to live apart from Him in hell, for eternity. Instead, God is “not wanting any to perish, but all to come to repentance”, so that they might enter into relationship with Him. Share that 2 Peter 3:9 verse with them and take the opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them – they even they, who are just as bad as Scrooge in God’s eyes, can be saved. Then, invite them (if you feel prompted to by God) to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Disney’s A Christmas Carol is now available to stream through Disney+.
​
0 Comments

Blessed To Be A Blessing - Pay It Forward (2000)

11/30/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content, read Christian Spotlight On Entertainment’s review:
www.christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2000/payitforward.html
 
Trevor McKenney: “I think some people are too scared, or something (to pay it forward). I guess it's hard for people who are so used to things the way they are - even if they're bad - to change. 'Cause they kind of give up. And when they do, everybody kind of loses.”
​
​If you identify yourself as a realist or a cynic, I will forewarn you: Mimi Leder’s Pay It Forward might just provoke an eye-rolling for the ages. Foolishly or otherwise, it’s screenwriter Leslie Dixon (loosely adapting Catherine Ryan Hyde's novel of the same name) believes wholeheartedly in the notion that humanity has the potential to overcome their most selfish, foolish, regrettable behaviour, and replace it with altruistic tendencies. In his review, Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert, responded to the film’s central conceit coldly, and with burst-your-bubble scepticism: “It's a seductive theory, but in the real world, altruism is less powerful than selfishness, greed, nepotism, xenophobia, tribalism and paranoia. If you doubt me, take another look at the front pages.”

Whilst I emphatically disagree with Mr. Ebert’s sentiments, I believe I understand why he responded in such a manner. Looking around us, you’d almost be forgiven for thinking that the world was irredeemable, that it had gone too far this time in its pursuit of evil. But for Christians such as myself, we live in the knowledge that there is a living hope – Jesus Christ, the One who can redeem and restore all things to right-living and relationship with their Creator. So, Mr. Ebert is correct to doubt, as humanity’s propensity for altruism fails when it works isolation. But when we call upon the One who is infinitely stronger than our greatest minds combined, asking for His help, He is able to give us the ability to live a life of selfless concern for the well-being of others. He gives us the ability to do something extraordinary: ‘pay it forward’.

​In spite of the film’s various plot diversions and revelations of emotional power, the story of Pay It Forward might be summarised thusly: Spurred on by his social studies teacher, Mr. Simonet (Kevin Spacey), 11-year-old Trevor McKinney (Haley Joel Osment) begins a movement of goodwill towards his fellow man, in order to make the world a better place. Rather than decide to pay a favour back, Trevor decides to ‘pay it forward’ by blessing three new people, in three distinctive ways, encouraging them to then go and do the same by reaching three others. His honourable dedication to the task at hand, goes on to not only change his recovering alcoholic mother (Helen Hunt), and his physically and emotionally scarred teacher, Mr. Simonet, but far more people than he could ever have imagined.
 
Unbeknownst to him, Trevor’s actions help to form an ever-growing movement comprised of all the people who have been subsequently affected by Trevor’s decision to ‘pay it forward’. Originating in Las Vegas, Nevada, we watch as this trend of goodwill makes its way to Los Angeles, and even spreads to other areas of the country. It’s through coming into contact with Trevor, or spending time with him, that people are somehow moved to change their ways. Perhaps it’s due to the mere presence of an innocent, young boy, which reminds and encourages them to get back in touch with their own childlike virtues. But perhaps its simpler than that - these are people who find themselves inexplicably blessed, but in experiencing such undeserved favour, are moved to be a blessing to those around them. It’s because they spent time with someone who valued them, believed in them and knew they were destined for better, greater things.
​
Picture

​In turn, Trevor’s movement (whilst unintentional), reminded me a great deal of Jesus’s intentional time upon earth. He began a movement, of sorts, which was embodied in his day-to-day ministry and subsequently became world-shaping. Jesus specifically chose to spend time with people, imparting upon them His Father’s teachings, encouraging them to turn from their sinful ways and be welcomed into relationship with Him – both in the present and eternal. In doing so, many He came into contact with were healed by Him, and, as a result, went on to speak about Jesus publicly (Mark 1:40-45), whilst others decided to follow Him (Matthew 20:29-34). Some even chose to follow directly in His footsteps, when Jesus called them to be His disciples. These men (‘the twelve’) were perfectly ordinary, but when they came into contact with Jesus and were saved by Him, they too went on to become makers and shakers in their regions, and throughout the ancient world. Take Peter for instance – a fisherman whom Jesus invested time and effort in, because He knew that Peter was destined to do greater things, proclaiming: “I will send you out to fish for people” (Matthew 4:19, NIV). Peter went on to speak about Jesus wherever he was sent, but upon one occasion, he spoke before a mass gathering, where “about three thousand were added to their number (or movement, if you will) that day” (Acts 2:40-42, NIV). Many were blessed and saved by Jesus. So, in turn, they decided to ‘pay it forward’ in tending to people’s physical needs, but also their spiritual, by proclaiming the Good News about salvation for all turn to Jesus.
 
The most distinct similarity between those who came into contact with Trevor and Jesus, was that none of them deserved the favour which was extended to them. Rather, they were offered unconditional favour and grace regardless of who they were, where they came from, or what they had done. And such actions even led to their redemption. But the act of Trevor extending such grace and mercy to those whom society would more than likely turn a blind eye to, is exactly what the Bible teaches that Jesus has done for humanity.
​
Picture
 
In fact, Jesus himself was “the Son of Man” who “came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10, NIV). He was sent to Earth over 2000 years ago, by His Father, God, the creator of the universe, to make a way to save all of those in need of redemption. Just like the broken and needy characters which populate Leder’s film, the Bible teaches that humanity too is in need of redemption. For the author of Romans 3:23 (NIV) writes, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”, which means that each and every one of us have been touched by the darkness of this world. We have chosen to do wrong in the eyes of God, succumbing to our own selfish desires over His, thereby excluding ourselves from a relationship with the God of the universe. All of us “…have wandered away like sheep. Each of us has gone his own (sinful) way.” (Isaiah 53:6, ICB). But as Leder’s film maintains, we are better than the worst thing we have ever done and can indeed be forgiven. How then is that possible?
 
The Bible teaches that Jesus “died for everyone”, “so that those who receive His new life will no longer live for themselves. Instead, they will live for Christ, who died and was raised for them” (2 Corinthians 5:15, NLT). This “means that anyone who belongs to Christ” will “become a new person”, for when we are friends of God, “The old life is gone; a new life has begun!” (2 Corinthians 5:17, NLT). But this was only made possible through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, who took the punishment that we deserved when He was crucified and died on the Cross. God wanted us to know just “how much he loves us”, that even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT) and chose to live apart from Him, He made a way for us to be saved from “the wages of sin”, which “is (eternal) death” (Romans 6:23, NIV) - cut off from our Father in Heaven. We need no longer live in separation from Him, but enter into freedom with God today, by asking Him to forgive us of our sins, welcoming Him into our life and turning away from our old ways of living.
 
Sadly, Trevor’s life is tragically cut short in the film’s final act, and we see that many people come to pay their respects to the young man who inspired so many. It’s a painful moment, in an otherwise uplifting film. But it’s also where the Christ-figure comparisons (sort of) come to an end. Unlike Jesus, there is no miraculous triumph over death for Trevor. But in the film’s final shot, however, we witness many come to pay their respects at the family home – with many more on the way, lighting the streets with candles as they make their pilgrimage to the home. Thankfully, the movement doesn’t die with Trevor, it is lit brightly for all to see, and it reaches untold numbers of people. Something better, and more uplifting can be said for Jesus, however, who upon defeating the power of death, made a way for all to be redeemed and join his life-giving ‘movement’, led by the One who is alive and can reign in our hearts today. For in becoming a friend of Jesus we are blessed with a favour that we could never afford, but that we can always ‘pay forward’, in sharing His name globally, through the power of the Holy Spirit, who empowers us not to do “what your sinful nature craves”, but His will – which is to live a life without sin, and in service to Him.
​
Picture
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Pay It Forward for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Trevor’s noble idea to ‘pay it forward’ – would it be a feasible, effective movement in our everyday life? Or do you think that people might laugh at the idea? Prompt them to consider the notion of showing someone favour, regardless of whether they deserve it or not. Is it a foolish thing to do? Go on to breach the subject of Jesus and His undeserved gift of grace which He lovingly showed to us, unconditionally. What do they think about that? If it’s real, is that something worth ‘paying forward’? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that we have the opportunity to receive the gift of salvation in Jesus today – even though we don’t deserve it. Invite them, if you feel prompted by God, to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Pay It Forward is available to rent through Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV (in the UK).
​
0 Comments

“I got soul, but I'm not a soldier…” - The Iron Giant (1999)

11/23/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In Review: http://www.pluggedin.com/movie-reviews/irongiant

Hogarth Hughes: "It's bad to kill. Guns kill. And you don't have to be a gun.
You are what you choose to be. You choose. Choose.
"

In August 1999, the animated contemporary classic The Iron Giant, opened in
U.S. markets to many favourable reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes’ consensus summarised them thusly: “The endearing Iron Giant tackles ambitious topics and complex human relationships with a steady hand and beautifully animated direction from Brad Bird”. Sadly, such high praise is rarely spoken of an animated film – the Despicable Me’s and The Emoji Movie’s of the film world are usually preoccupied with being harmlessly cutesy, and not providing audiences (both children and adults alike) with artful ruminations on what it means to be alive, possess a soul and how one can become ‘good’. (And to some extent, that’s understandable.) The Iron Giant, however, offers all of this and more, in what the late great Roger Ebert described as “a Cold War parable”, “in which the Iron Giant learns from a little boy that he is not doomed to be a weapon”, because "you are what you choose to be" – naturally an important sentiment for
​children to learn, but one which is also held by God, in His word, the Bible...  

​​Set in 1957 America, at the height of the Cold War, The Iron Giant introduces us to the adventurous Hogarth (voiced by Eli Marienthal) - a nine-year-old who lives with his mother Annie (Jennifer Aniston), in the quiet town of Rockwell, Maine. One night, a 50-foot robot mysteriously descends from the skies and plummets into the nearby sea. He soon awakes, and wanders into Rockwell – led by a seemingly insatiable desire for nutritious metal to munch upon. Not content with chomping tractors in half, the Giant fancies himself a TV antenna - Hogarth’s TV antenna in fact, which displeases him greatly. Excited by tales of extra-terrestrial lifeforms and frightened by the educational “Duck and Cover” films shown in school, Hogarth is nonetheless determined to investigate this strange occurrence, which leads him to discover the Giant attempting to consume a power station. Saved from electrocution by Hogarth, the Giant assumes duties as Hogarth’s protector, who in turn must protect his ginormous friend from prying government eyes…
 
Throughout the course of the film, we come to learn more of the Giant’s backstory and of his defensive system (particularly in the 2015 signature cut which reveals the Giant is a soldier), which when employed, may yield potentially catastrophic results. It turns out that the Giant is armed to the teeth with deadly, futuristic weaponry, hidden beneath his friendly outer shell. Unaware of his world-ending capabilities (he has a case of robotic amnesia), the Giant is mostly pacifistic in nature and only uses his might to protect Hogarth. This behaviour is encouraged by his wise young friend at a pivotal moment – discovering a deer who was shot and killed by hunters, in the woods. The pair mourn for the creature, and Hogarth explains the concept of death to the initially bemused robot, noting that such a beautiful thing was killed using a gun. The Giant learns that the use of guns brings only death and misery, with Hogarth gently reinforcing that peaceful resolutions must be sought over violence. Such wise teaching positively impacts the Giant’s behaviour, but when attacked by government forces, the Giant falls once more into a trance-like state, in which his violent programming threatens to take over completely. In one moment, having destroyed many government vehicles, he eventually comes to stand before Hogarth, poised to vaporise him. But Hogarth petitions him: “It's bad to kill. Guns kill. And you don't have to be a gun. You are what you choose to be. You choose. Choose.” Remarkably, the Giant overrides his programming, returning himself back to his gentler, more loving side. It’s one of the film’s many, beautiful moments, and one which reminded me of how the Bible teaches that humanity, like the Giant, has free will and doesn’t have to obey its own sinful, destructive programming.
​
Picture

​​For the Bible teaches that humanity possesses an inherently sinful nature, one which has the power to manifest itself in every part of our lives. Our bodies are “sinful flesh” according to Paul, writing in Romans 8:3 (ESV). We have within us “earthly” desires, which leads us to indulge within “fornication, impurity, passion, evil desire(s), and greed” (Colossians 3:5, NRSV). As a result of this sinful nature, our lives are not exactly our own – we are “enslaved to sin” (Romans 6:6, NRSV) and are destined to live a life in which our sinful nature dictates who we are, what we do and who we become. In fact, our ‘programming’ is so ingrained within us, that we cannot override these evil desires as the Giant did.
 
But there is hope, as the Giant managed to circumvent his programming when he learnt and called to mind the following: We all possess a precious soul within us that must be cared for, and we can make a decision to/be taught to turn away from our destructive ways. How is this possible? The Bible teaches that each of us possesses a soul, an invisible part of our being that lives on for eternity, even after the body experiences death. Hogarth affirms this: if “you have feelings, and you think about things… that means you have a soul”. The Giant, whilst made of metal, is in fact sentient – he has feelings and ponders some of life’s biggest questions with Hogarth. The film, however, is vague on where these souls come from. But the Bible teaches that God is the one who “made our very souls” (Jeremiah 38:16, NKJV) and they are designed to return to Him upon our departing from this earth.
 
However, they can be destined for one of two eternal destinations – Heaven, with God our Father, or Hell, completely separated from our Creator. Sadly, our sinful programming dictates that we are destined to be separated from God’s loving arms – “For the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23, NIV). If we don’t overcome the darkness which pervades from our lives, we will not only experience physical death, but a spiritual one too. But God has made a way for sinful souls to be cleansed, to give us an opportunity to acknowledge our own sinfulness and accept God’s gracious gift of forgiveness, which leads to eternal life. He achieved this in sending His one and only Son to earth, giving Him over as a sacrifice in our place (taking the punishment we deserved and our sin upon Him). He was crucified on the cross as the “…offering for our sin”, so “that we could be made right with God through Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:21, NLT).
​
Picture

​So, are we able to learn how to overcome our sinful nature? Hogarth says that we have the ability to choose, quite simply, whether we’re good or bad. In a sense, he’s correct. But the Bible teaches that we cannot redeem ourselves alone. For every stand we make against our sin, we cannot destroy its effects in the present, or the eternal, and hope to be freed from it. No, to be righteous in the sight of God, it requires us to make a choice which starts with Christ. For when we choose to follow Jesus, he gives us a new nature: “…if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” (2 Corinthians 5:17, NIV). And He fills us with his Holy Spirit which gives us the ability to choose to act righteously, instead of giving in to our sinful desires: “…walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.” (Galatians 5:16, NIV). It is only through Jesus doing a work in us, that we may pursue positive change in our lives. For once we have encountered who Christ is, we naturally will not want to do the bad, but only focus upon the good. It is in Christ alone, that our ‘programming’ is completely rewired, and we go on to experience “life…to the full” (John 10:10, NIV) with Him.
 
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Iron Giant for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Hogarth’s idea of what it means to possess a soul. Think: Is it real? Can it be seen? Do you have one? Or is it for only good people? Prompt them to consider their own soul, asking if they have an idea where their soul will end up, some day. Also, breach the subject of choice with them. Do they believe they have free will, and are they using it for good? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that we have abused our free will and cannot become ‘good’ without Christ’s help. To end, share with them about the unconditional love and forgiveness that is found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Iron Giant is available to rent through Amazon Prime Video and YouTube Movies (in the UK).
​
0 Comments

Destination: Life. Status: Delayed - The Terminal (2004)

11/16/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture





Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In Review: The Terminal.

Frank Dixon: “…you don't qualify for asylum, refugee status, temporary protective status, humanitarian parole, non-immigration work travel visa… You at this time are simply…"unacceptable".”







​To this day, I continue to maintain that Steven Spielberg’s The Terminal is a Christmas film. Am I able to provide evidence to substantiate my claim? To some extent, yes – even in spite of the film not being explicitly set at Christmas. When commenting upon the reoccurring themes of director Frank Capra’s critically lauded filmography, film author Richard Griffith summarised them thusly: A “messianic innocent ... pits himself against the forces of entrenched greed. His inexperience defeats him strategically, but his gallant integrity in the face of temptation calls for the goodwill of the "little people", and through their combined protest, he triumphs”. Such motifs are present within Capra’s It's a Wonderful Life (1946) and have continued to influence generations of Christmas films after it – from the heart-warming, to the unapologetically whimsical. The Terminal is the collective embodiment of Capra’s favourite subjects, lovingly wrapped up in the spirit of the Christmas season. But it serves a greater purpose to us today, in bringing us far more than festive cheer, but a timely message with strong links to the hope of the Gospel message.

​The Terminal chronicles the tale of one Victor Navorski (Tom Hanks), an Eastern European man who learns that whilst en route to JFK airport, his country entered into a state of political unrest. Following the destabilisation of his homeland’s government and the outbreak of conflict, Victor’s passport and visa are revoked, and he is forced to remain in the airport by the vindictive, self-serving bureaucratic customs officer, Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci). Much to Victor’s bewilderment, Frank informs him that he is stateless and must settle in at the terminal for the duration. Treated harshly by airport officials and terminal staff, without a place to rest his head, and anxious about the uncertain future of his country, Victor struggles to adapt to this highly irregular life within the terminal. But, chance encounters with cheery outsiders such as himself, might just help to see him through…
 
Previous to writing this article, my recollection of The Terminal largely consisted of Hanks’ Victor acting non-plussed for the majority of the film’s runtime. And to some extent, I’m not wrong. Spielberg and his screenwriters know how to write Victor, a fish out of water, into some highly amusing situations – not least when an unassuming passenger asks Victor with a heavy sigh, “Do you ever feel like you’re living in an airport?”. However, I forgot just how much pathos Hanks imbues within the character, particularly in a scene in which Victor realises that his (fictional) nation of Krakozhia is at civil war. Victor, a non-English speaker, cannot understand the news reports he sees on the terminal’s televisions, and when he tearfully begs passers-by to help translate for him, he is only ever brushed aside. To make matters worse, customs officer Frank labels Victor’s visa status “unacceptable”, but we can’t help but feel in the moment, that by Frank’s actions and attitudes, he finds Victor to be just that. These scenes are emotional, not least because they resonate with audiences in 2020, when the plight of refugees is such a disturbing reality. Of course, this is a more sanitised version of so many refugee stories, but there is something so genuinely painful about Victor’s struggle. For the most part, we forget that we’re watching Tom Hanks and instead see a man who is stateless, robbed of his identity and scared. 
​
Picture

​In turn, Victor’s refugee story unexpectedly brought to mind the plight of the Israelites, who suffered oppression due to their enslavement within Egypt. Foreigners in a far-off land, the Israelites were treated cruelly as refugees – forced to work as captives in a land they could never call home. Whilst Victor is never enslaved throughout the course of the film (he is inadvertently employed at one point, however), he is oppressed. Those who work within the terminal’s shops insult, laugh or ignore him, either because they don’t take the time to understand Victor, or they’re just ‘too busy’ to acknowledge him as someone who requires basic human rights. Frank’s actions are far worse, however. Throughout the course of the film, he uses condescending language/tone, gives Victor insufficient supplies and makes it his personal vendetta to rid the terminal of Victor, without once trying to understand him. In Exodus 23:9 (NLT), God specifically instructs his people, the Israelites, not to conduct themselves in this way: “You must not oppress foreigners. You know what it’s like to be a foreigner, for you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt.” Following Him liberating the Israelites from their captivity, it was God’s desire for the Israelite people to live their lives as He does, imitating His holy behaviour in every way. They were to be a people whose righteousness clearly set them apart from the evil practices of their time, and ultimately spoke to the righteous way in which God acts – generally and towards humanity.
 
Rather than treat them as outcasts, therefore, God called for the Israelites to treat foreigners or refugees as citizens among them, and to do so with love. In fact, they were instructed to: “Treat them as you would an Israelite, and love them as you love yourselves. Remember that you were once foreigners in the land of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.” (Leviticus 19:34, GNT). But God’s desired treatment of foreigners and refugees went further than that, when God commanded the Israelites to Invite them to be a part of their community. Living by God’s holy Law meant that foreigners were to be included in all aspects of the Jewish community, including provisions for them to be treated equally under the law and to even be included in festivals and celebrations of the community (Deuteronomy 14:28-29, 16:14, 26:11).
​
Picture
By the film’s end, we see many unlikely characters come to embody this behaviour for themselves. Even the most hardened of hearts warm to Victor, inviting him into their communities by feeding him and treating him as one of their own. Some, like the Israelites, even understand what it means to be a foreigner, and strive to help Victor at his point of greatest need, which is to liberate him, by helping him to leave the airport. But the Bible later teaches in the New Testament that we, like Victor, need to be met at our point of greatest need – one which goes beyond the physical, to the spiritual: to be liberated from the grip of sin. For the Bible teaches that in the eyes of God, humanity is in “slavery to sin” (Romans 6:18, NLT). When we choose to live our lives apart from God, doing whatever, whenever we choose to do so, we become foreigners and strangers to Him – held in captivity by the darkness we engage with. But God in His great mercy wishes to free us from that place of captivity, and welcome us all, foreigners and strangers alike, into His loving community. But how do we know this? In His word, God promises that we can be saved by putting our complete hope, trust and faith in Jesus: “…it is by God's grace that you have been saved through faith. It is not the result of your own efforts, but God's gift…” (Ephesians 2:8-10, GNT). For whilst we have done wrong in God’s eyes by living for ourselves, He “has shown us how much he loves us” in sending Christ to die for us, taking the punishment that we deserved when He was crucified on the Cross, even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT). Through His perfect sacrifice, Jesus has given us the opportunity, “by the Spirit”, to “put to death your sinful actions”, so that “you will live” (Romans 8:13, GNT) forever in relationship with Him. 
 
So, when we choose to no longer live as foreigners and strangers to God, and come into friendship with Him, He welcomes us into relationship – a perfect friendship which saves us from eternal death in Hell and gives us the gift of eternal life spent in Heaven with Him (“For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.””, Romans 10:13 – ESV). When we put our faith in him, we become part of God’s community. You are “…not foreigners or strangers any longer; you are now citizens together with God's people and members of the family of God.” (Ephesians 2:19, GNT). Such wonderful truths encourage me, as a Christian, in the knowledge that I can and should identify with the idea of not belonging, as the reason why I treat refugees or displaced people without discrimination. For in His perfect, loving kindness, God did not ignore me or my fellow Christians, even though I had done wrong in His eyes. So, we too must share that same kindness with others today.
Picture
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Terminal for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Victor and his mistreatment by those within the terminal. How does that make you feel as someone who might have missed the foreigner/stranger in need? Prompt them to consider the characters’ lack of compassion – how would they respond to the situation if they worked in the terminal? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that Victor was eventually shown unconditional kindness, despite the terminal and America, not being his home. To end, share with them about the unconditional love and forgiveness that is found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Terminal is available to stream on Netflix (UK).

0 Comments

Take A Walk On The Wild Side - Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009)

11/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture



Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In review.
 
Mrs. Fox: “Twelve fox-years ago you made a promise to me . . . you would never steal another chicken . . . and I believed you. Why? Why did you lie to me?”
 
Mr. Fox: “Because I’m a wild animal."





​
​At a lean 87 minutes, Wes Anderson’s stop motion animation Fantastic Mr. Fox (a loose adaptation of the Roald Dahl classic), manages to pull off a rare cinematic feat: offer perceptive and mature reflections upon human nature, which are framed within a ‘children’s film’ concerning mischievous woodland creatures. On paper then, Anderson’s film – featuring a heady mix of autumnal colouring, classic American pop and an obsession with symmetrical framing – just shouldn’t work. Is it a film for adults, children or both? In short, it’s a delight to be shared with everyone, but particularly those who are learning of/attempting to control the affections and desires of the “flesh”, which so often run contrary to God’s laws. But what of our anthropomorphic ‘hero’ Mr. Fox? Can or should he, a self-described “wild animal”, ever hope to overcome his animalistic tendencies in order to live a less self-centred life, for the sake of his family? Or must he simply give in to his seemingly harmless desire to place birds between his teeth?

Upon learning that his wife is pregnant with their first cub, Mr. Fox (George Clooney), a lovable rogue with a penchant for chicken thieving, makes a promise to Mrs. Fox (Meryl Streep): he will find himself an alternative, less dangerous form of employment, to ensure his family’s safety. But twelve years later, Mr. Fox’s role as a columnist leaves him feeling unfulfilled, and he misses the excitement and adrenaline brought on by his former career. Not content with living in a foxhole any longer (it makes him “feel poor”), Mr. Fox purchases a literal tree house, much to the behest of his lawyer (Bill Murray), who forewarns him that the farms of Boggis, Bunce, and Bean are in close proximity to his family home. But Mr. Fox isn’t concerned with those powerful, violent and mean-spirited men - he’s far more interested in devising and carrying out plans to rob them blind. And that he does, which his victims naturally do not take kindly, planning a retaliation for the ages. Is Foxie’s crossing over of the line, whilst exhilarating and highly amusing, worthwhile after all?
 
Fantastic Mr. Fox revels and delights in incorporating tropes of filmmaking into its frivolities. The one which appealed most to me is that of the ‘one last job’ conceit, which has influenced many a filmmaker, from Michael Mann (Heat) to Christopher Nolan (Inception). Here, Mr. Fox decides that he’s going to “secretly do one last big job on the sly”, despite sub-consciously acknowledging the threat it might pose to his family, and his marriage. Whilst his “master plan” is executed without error, leading him to amass an impressive haul, it predictably serves only to enrage the local farmers. So, when the combined workforces of Boggis, Bunce and Bean lead a ridiculous, all-out assault on Fox’s tree house, the crafty fox is forced to not only step into the role of “the quote-unquote fantastic Mr. Fox”, but also confront who he has allowed himself to become.

Picture
​​In a rare moment of quiet away from the crazed farmers, Mrs. Fox pulls her husband aside, tearfully demanding that Mr. Fox explain his reasoning for such reckless behaviour. “Because I’m a wild animal”, is his only defence. Earlier, he even struggles to attempt to justify his actions to himself and to a friend, when he says “…how can a fox ever be happy…without a chicken in its teeth?”. For Mr. Fox, he believes that it is within his inbuilt nature to want to steal, which he manipulates to excuse himself of any wrongdoing. In other words, he’s saying that ‘this is who I am’, for which he makes no apology. In a sense, this is permissible - Mr. Fox’s animalistic nature is what his creator wrote into his very being. However, this tale is allegorical, designed to convey morals to its human viewers. The animals are therefore representatives of us – humans, who unlike animals, can and do know better. So, whilst we might feel as if we are bound to our ‘human nature’, does that necessarily mean that we should act upon our every impulse?
 
According to the Bible, Mr. Fox’s misguided actions (and by extension, our own) are not always permissible – even if we feel that we were born a certain way or are doing something for the sake of our own perceived happiness. For whilst anyone can be born with a disposition towards something, and genuinely feel as if that is ‘who they are’, we aren’t always justified in the pursuit of that. For example, what if acting upon such a disposition hurts ourselves, or those we love? The Bible teaches that humanity has ultimately been born with a disposition to sin, even particular mistakes such as theft - made clear in the case of Mr. Fox, who maintains that his nature defines who he is. This is because everyone has been born with a sinful nature, which we ourselves inherited: Sin “…came into the world through one man (Adam), and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned…” (Romans 5:12, NRSV). In Psalm 51 (ICB), we even read King David acknowledging this sinful state within himself: “I was brought into this world in sin. In sin my mother gave birth to me.”. From birth onwards, therefore, the Bible teaches that we all become “…people (who) have sinned and are (therefore) not good enough for God’s glory.” (Romans 3:23, ICB).
​
Picture
Learning that we are born with a disposition to sin, might be wrongly interpreted by Mr. Fox and humanity by and large, as a ‘get out of jail free’ card. However, the Bible teaches that just because we are fallen in nature, it doesn’t mean that we must act upon our every whim. For God hasn’t created us to be sinners – those who do whatever they like, not thinking of the consequences. In fact, the Bible teaches that just because “something is technically legal”, it “doesn’t mean that it’s spiritually appropriate” for us to engage with (1 Corinthians 6:12, MSG). But each of us, in our own ways, have chosen to give in to our sinful nature: “We all have wandered away like sheep. Each of us has gone his own (sinful) way.” (Isaiah 53:6, ICB). And in so doing, all that we receive following our life here on earth, are “…the wages of sin (which) is death” – that which leads us to spend eternity in separation from God in hell (Romans 3:23, NLT).
 
However, God teaches through His Word the Bible, that we don’t have to conform ourselves to our sinful nature. For by doing so, we will not receive the happiness or satisfaction which we or Mr. Fox seek. Just as in Fantastic Mr. Fox, all that our sin will bring upon us is disaster – both literally and spiritually, both here and in eternity. Rather, we need not act upon our sinful desires, which hurt ourselves and have the potential to hurt those around us. All that we must do, in order to “have life, and have it to the full” (John 10:10, NIV), just as Mr. Fox so desperately seeks, is come to Jesus. For whilst we have done wrong in God’s eyes by living for ourselves, He “has shown us how much he loves us” in sending Christ to die for us, taking the punishment that we deserved, even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT). Through His perfect sacrifice on the Cross, Jesus has given us the opportunity, “by the Spirit”, for “you put to death your sinful actions”, so that “you will live” (Romans 8:13, GNT) forever in relationship with Him. In Christ alone, even a sinful, ‘wild animal’ such as Mr. Fox can learn to put to death “put to death…the earthly desires at work in” him (Colossians 3:5, GNT), to then truly live the life fantastic.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Fantastic Mr. Fox for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Mr. Fox and his pursuit of happiness – is it just harmless fun, or is it reckless, and perhaps even dangerous? Prompt them to consider the cost of Mr. Fox’s actions too – do they feel that what he accomplished was worth all of that, regardless of the consequences? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that Mr. Fox’s selfish pursuit of happiness only brought Him pain and anguish. To end, share with them about the complete happiness and fulfilment found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Fantastic Mr. Fox is available to stream on Amazon Prime (UK).
 
0 Comments

Kickin’ Back The Bucket - The Bucket List

11/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

​​Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is
also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content,
read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In review.
 
It’s been thirteen years since the release of Rob Reiner’s comedy-drama,
The Bucket List – an unapologetically schmaltzy studio film which draws upon
the legendary acting talents of two men, who at the time, were
gracefully entering into their twilight years. You know, typically breezy
Sunday afternoon programming. But when viewed for the first time in the
very serious year of 2020, the film’s aura of oversentimentality seems
excessive, and not at all sweet. And yet somehow in spite of itself, The Bucket
List
succeeds in telling an otherwise compelling story – especially
when confronting it’s viewers with weighty questions, such as: If faced with
the imminent, inevitability of your death, what would you choose to do with
​the time that is left to you?

​And for a dour year such as this, in which many people have been forced to confront their own fragile mortality when faced with a deadly virus, The Bucket List seems timely, especially in prompting us to reconsider what we value most in life, and whether or not we’re in dire need of re-examining it all-together, before we kick the proverbial bucket… 

Jack Nicholson plays Edward Cole, a corporate billionaire who one might describe as the 21st century equivalent of Ebenezer Scrooge – a ruthless businessman with little regard for people, but a strong desire to protect his financial assets, regardless of the pain he inflicts upon others. So much so, in fact, that within the hospitals owned and operated by Edward, his own regulations state that all rooms are double occupancy for the sake of cost-efficiency. This is all well and good, until Edward is unexpectedly diagnosed with cancer, and informed that he cannot have his own private room but must learn to share – much to his annoyance. Enter Carter Chambers (Morgan Freeman), Edward’s roommate and an average Joe mechanic, who cares very little for his roomie’s impolite behaviour and is perfectly content with living a ‘less is more’ lifestyle. As the two undergo various treatments, an unlikely bond slowly forms between them. But sadly, despite the best efforts of their medical teams, the pair are given just a short time to live. Rather than accept defeat, however, Carter and Edward write a list containing all of the things they have ever wanted to do before they die and embark upon an adventure of a lifetime.
 
What follows is a collection of heart-warming sequences which regularly switch back and forth in genre, from the comic road movie to a spiritual journey. As their bond of friendship deepens between them, so does their trust in one another, which leads to the two men sharing poignant conversations about faith, joy, what happens after we die, and even the existence of God. There isn’t a great deal of depth to their religious/philosophical musings, but it does lead both Edward and Carter to contemplate what truly matters most to them in life. For at first, their bucket project stems from a largely self-centred desire to gift experiences to themselves, which they feel, for one reason or another, they deserve to enjoy. They go skydiving, visit the Taj Mahal, fly over the North Pole, ride motorcycles on the Great Wall of China and more… But still, in spite of the many escapades which they share with one another, something still seems to be missing in their lives. And in the quieter moments between them, the men share vulnerable tête-à-têtes regarding their flaws and regrets, subsequently revealing what they’re missing in life. For example, whilst sat atop the Great Pyramid, Carter reveals a loss of love for his wife, and Edward confesses his misguided actions which led to becoming estranged from his only daughter. The trip, whilst powerful and awe-inspiring, still can’t fill the respective voids within their life, which brings them to search for meaning and joy. 
​
Picture
In one moment, Carter asks Edward the following two questions, which Egyptian Gods supposedly would ask people: (1) Have you found joy in your life? (2) Has your life brought joy to others? If answering honestly, neither man could answer yes to both questions. Their quest is one to find joy in the world, but following the trip, Edward is left feeling alone (literally and figuratively), whilst Carter is surrounded by more important things in life which bring him joy, such as family.
 
Both men experience the joy that comes from the world, particularly Edward, who indulges in the “the fleeting pleasures of sin” (Hebrews 11:25, NLT) such as when he invites escorts to his home, but only breaks down weeping in his luxury high-rise suite, when he realises just how worthless the experience actually is. Edward and Carter’s joy (whilst the source of the latter’s is more positive overall) is still temporary no matter what they do, as health issues or the breakdown of relationships continue to rob them of their joy, in preparing for their deaths.  

King Solomon, much like Edward and Carter, attempted to find joy and happiness in the things of this world, saying: “I said to myself, "Come now, I will test you with pleasure to find out what is good." But that also proved to be meaningless… What does pleasure accomplish?” (Ecclesiastes 2:1-2, NIV). Solomon realised that the joy of the world is unfulfilling, but that the joy which the Lord brings is rich, abundant and sustains us in a way that this world never could. Today, Christians have access to that very same joy, made possible by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the Cross. For we were once sinners, robbed of joy and “life in all its fullness” by Satan, the “thief” who came to “kill and destroy” (John 10:10, ICB) by leading us into sin. But Jesus was sent by His Father God, to free us of the grip that sin had upon our lives, by taking our sin upon himself and destroying its power forever, when He died and rose again three days later. Through His sacrifice on the Cross, He made a way for us to be able to ask for forgiveness, become saved from eternal death apart from God, and experience a sense of joy from the Lord which can be readily present, even as we face difficulties in our life. For when we believe and know in our hearts that we are children of God, knowing that we are heirs to “a priceless inheritance” (1 Peter 1:4, NLT) which is the gift of eternal life, we can be secure in the joy of salvation He brings, not looking for such fulfilment elsewhere. Edward and Carter might eventually find their joy in family and friends, but such joy which only the Lord brings, gives us a hope for eternity – something which these two men do not have, and the filmmakers do not believe in. But when we come to God and receive His love, joy, hope and peace, we need not look elsewhere.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Bucket List for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Edward's outlook on life - do they think that we can experience fullness of joy in the everyday, or do we need to look elsewhere? What about for Carter, do they think that family's enough to give us joy?  Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, majoring on the complete joy of salvation which a relationship with Jesus brings to us. 

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, As I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Bucket List is available to stream on Amazon Prime (UK)

0 Comments
<<Previous
    Subscribe here

    Reviews written by
    Scott Gentry

    ​scott@k180.org

    CInema has been a huge part of my life for as long as I can remember. It's thrilled me, challenged me and even been used by God to draw me closer to Him.
    ​
    Now, in every film-watching experience, I try to remember the advice of John Calvin, who said not to be dismissive of truth wherever it shall appear, which I can champion and use for God's purposes.

    ​Inspired by Calvin's words, I was eager to begin talking about the 'good' that appears in film, so that others can share it for the sake of the Gospel. It's for this reason, that this initiative exists and I pray that these reviews would bless you in your evangelism. 

    ​Scott's Favourite Films:
    - True Grit (2010)
    - Barry Lyndon (1975)
    - Once Upon A Time In The West (1968) 
    - Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) 

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Training
Emerging Evangelists Institute
History Makers
Sharing Jesus
Who are you following?
Music
​Join us on the streets?
Donate
More about us
Contact us
Newsletters
​Privacy Notice