Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content, read Christian Spotlight On Entertainment’s review:
www.christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2000/payitforward.html
 
Trevor McKenney: “I think some people are too scared, or something (to pay it forward). I guess it's hard for people who are so used to things the way they are - even if they're bad - to change. 'Cause they kind of give up. And when they do, everybody kind of loses.”
​
​If you identify yourself as a realist or a cynic, I will forewarn you: Mimi Leder’s Pay It Forward might just provoke an eye-rolling for the ages. Foolishly or otherwise, it’s screenwriter Leslie Dixon (loosely adapting Catherine Ryan Hyde's novel of the same name) believes wholeheartedly in the notion that humanity has the potential to overcome their most selfish, foolish, regrettable behaviour, and replace it with altruistic tendencies. In his review, Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert, responded to the film’s central conceit coldly, and with burst-your-bubble scepticism: “It's a seductive theory, but in the real world, altruism is less powerful than selfishness, greed, nepotism, xenophobia, tribalism and paranoia. If you doubt me, take another look at the front pages.”

Whilst I emphatically disagree with Mr. Ebert’s sentiments, I believe I understand why he responded in such a manner. Looking around us, you’d almost be forgiven for thinking that the world was irredeemable, that it had gone too far this time in its pursuit of evil. But for Christians such as myself, we live in the knowledge that there is a living hope – Jesus Christ, the One who can redeem and restore all things to right-living and relationship with their Creator. So, Mr. Ebert is correct to doubt, as humanity’s propensity for altruism fails when it works isolation. But when we call upon the One who is infinitely stronger than our greatest minds combined, asking for His help, He is able to give us the ability to live a life of selfless concern for the well-being of others. He gives us the ability to do something extraordinary: ‘pay it forward’.

​In spite of the film’s various plot diversions and revelations of emotional power, the story of Pay It Forward might be summarised thusly: Spurred on by his social studies teacher, Mr. Simonet (Kevin Spacey), 11-year-old Trevor McKinney (Haley Joel Osment) begins a movement of goodwill towards his fellow man, in order to make the world a better place. Rather than decide to pay a favour back, Trevor decides to ‘pay it forward’ by blessing three new people, in three distinctive ways, encouraging them to then go and do the same by reaching three others. His honourable dedication to the task at hand, goes on to not only change his recovering alcoholic mother (Helen Hunt), and his physically and emotionally scarred teacher, Mr. Simonet, but far more people than he could ever have imagined.
 
Unbeknownst to him, Trevor’s actions help to form an ever-growing movement comprised of all the people who have been subsequently affected by Trevor’s decision to ‘pay it forward’. Originating in Las Vegas, Nevada, we watch as this trend of goodwill makes its way to Los Angeles, and even spreads to other areas of the country. It’s through coming into contact with Trevor, or spending time with him, that people are somehow moved to change their ways. Perhaps it’s due to the mere presence of an innocent, young boy, which reminds and encourages them to get back in touch with their own childlike virtues. But perhaps its simpler than that - these are people who find themselves inexplicably blessed, but in experiencing such undeserved favour, are moved to be a blessing to those around them. It’s because they spent time with someone who valued them, believed in them and knew they were destined for better, greater things.
​

​In turn, Trevor’s movement (whilst unintentional), reminded me a great deal of Jesus’s intentional time upon earth. He began a movement, of sorts, which was embodied in his day-to-day ministry and subsequently became world-shaping. Jesus specifically chose to spend time with people, imparting upon them His Father’s teachings, encouraging them to turn from their sinful ways and be welcomed into relationship with Him – both in the present and eternal. In doing so, many He came into contact with were healed by Him, and, as a result, went on to speak about Jesus publicly (Mark 1:40-45), whilst others decided to follow Him (Matthew 20:29-34). Some even chose to follow directly in His footsteps, when Jesus called them to be His disciples. These men (‘the twelve’) were perfectly ordinary, but when they came into contact with Jesus and were saved by Him, they too went on to become makers and shakers in their regions, and throughout the ancient world. Take Peter for instance – a fisherman whom Jesus invested time and effort in, because He knew that Peter was destined to do greater things, proclaiming: “I will send you out to fish for people” (Matthew 4:19, NIV). Peter went on to speak about Jesus wherever he was sent, but upon one occasion, he spoke before a mass gathering, where “about three thousand were added to their number (or movement, if you will) that day” (Acts 2:40-42, NIV). Many were blessed and saved by Jesus. So, in turn, they decided to ‘pay it forward’ in tending to people’s physical needs, but also their spiritual, by proclaiming the Good News about salvation for all turn to Jesus.
 
The most distinct similarity between those who came into contact with Trevor and Jesus, was that none of them deserved the favour which was extended to them. Rather, they were offered unconditional favour and grace regardless of who they were, where they came from, or what they had done. And such actions even led to their redemption. But the act of Trevor extending such grace and mercy to those whom society would more than likely turn a blind eye to, is exactly what the Bible teaches that Jesus has done for humanity.
​

 
In fact, Jesus himself was “the Son of Man” who “came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10, NIV). He was sent to Earth over 2000 years ago, by His Father, God, the creator of the universe, to make a way to save all of those in need of redemption. Just like the broken and needy characters which populate Leder’s film, the Bible teaches that humanity too is in need of redemption. For the author of Romans 3:23 (NIV) writes, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”, which means that each and every one of us have been touched by the darkness of this world. We have chosen to do wrong in the eyes of God, succumbing to our own selfish desires over His, thereby excluding ourselves from a relationship with the God of the universe. All of us “…have wandered away like sheep. Each of us has gone his own (sinful) way.” (Isaiah 53:6, ICB). But as Leder’s film maintains, we are better than the worst thing we have ever done and can indeed be forgiven. How then is that possible?
 
The Bible teaches that Jesus “died for everyone”, “so that those who receive His new life will no longer live for themselves. Instead, they will live for Christ, who died and was raised for them” (2 Corinthians 5:15, NLT). This “means that anyone who belongs to Christ” will “become a new person”, for when we are friends of God, “The old life is gone; a new life has begun!” (2 Corinthians 5:17, NLT). But this was only made possible through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, who took the punishment that we deserved when He was crucified and died on the Cross. God wanted us to know just “how much he loves us”, that even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT) and chose to live apart from Him, He made a way for us to be saved from “the wages of sin”, which “is (eternal) death” (Romans 6:23, NIV) - cut off from our Father in Heaven. We need no longer live in separation from Him, but enter into freedom with God today, by asking Him to forgive us of our sins, welcoming Him into our life and turning away from our old ways of living.
 
Sadly, Trevor’s life is tragically cut short in the film’s final act, and we see that many people come to pay their respects to the young man who inspired so many. It’s a painful moment, in an otherwise uplifting film. But it’s also where the Christ-figure comparisons (sort of) come to an end. Unlike Jesus, there is no miraculous triumph over death for Trevor. But in the film’s final shot, however, we witness many come to pay their respects at the family home – with many more on the way, lighting the streets with candles as they make their pilgrimage to the home. Thankfully, the movement doesn’t die with Trevor, it is lit brightly for all to see, and it reaches untold numbers of people. Something better, and more uplifting can be said for Jesus, however, who upon defeating the power of death, made a way for all to be redeemed and join his life-giving ‘movement’, led by the One who is alive and can reign in our hearts today. For in becoming a friend of Jesus we are blessed with a favour that we could never afford, but that we can always ‘pay forward’, in sharing His name globally, through the power of the Holy Spirit, who empowers us not to do “what your sinful nature craves”, but His will – which is to live a life without sin, and in service to Him.
​

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Pay It Forward for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Trevor’s noble idea to ‘pay it forward’ – would it be a feasible, effective movement in our everyday life? Or do you think that people might laugh at the idea? Prompt them to consider the notion of showing someone favour, regardless of whether they deserve it or not. Is it a foolish thing to do? Go on to breach the subject of Jesus and His undeserved gift of grace which He lovingly showed to us, unconditionally. What do they think about that? If it’s real, is that something worth ‘paying forward’? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that we have the opportunity to receive the gift of salvation in Jesus today – even though we don’t deserve it. Invite them, if you feel prompted by God, to consider accepting Jesus into their life today.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Pay It Forward is available to rent through Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV (in the UK).
​

Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In Review: http://www.pluggedin.com/movie-reviews/irongiant

Hogarth Hughes: "It's bad to kill. Guns kill. And you don't have to be a gun.
You are what you choose to be. You choose. Choose."

In August 1999, the animated contemporary classic The Iron Giant, opened in
U.S. markets to many favourable reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes’ consensus summarised them thusly: “The endearing Iron Giant tackles ambitious topics and complex human relationships with a steady hand and beautifully animated direction from Brad Bird”. Sadly, such high praise is rarely spoken of an animated film – the Despicable Me’s and The Emoji Movie’s of the film world are usually preoccupied with being harmlessly cutesy, and not providing audiences (both children and adults alike) with artful ruminations on what it means to be alive, possess a soul and how one can become ‘good’. (And to some extent, that’s understandable.) The Iron Giant, however, offers all of this and more, in what the late great Roger Ebert described as “a Cold War parable”, “in which the Iron Giant learns from a little boy that he is not doomed to be a weapon”, because "you are what you choose to be" – naturally an important sentiment for
​children to learn, but one which is also held by God, in His word, the Bible...  

​​Set in 1957 America, at the height of the Cold War, The Iron Giant introduces us to the adventurous Hogarth (voiced by Eli Marienthal) - a nine-year-old who lives with his mother Annie (Jennifer Aniston), in the quiet town of Rockwell, Maine. One night, a 50-foot robot mysteriously descends from the skies and plummets into the nearby sea. He soon awakes, and wanders into Rockwell – led by a seemingly insatiable desire for nutritious metal to munch upon. Not content with chomping tractors in half, the Giant fancies himself a TV antenna - Hogarth’s TV antenna in fact, which displeases him greatly. Excited by tales of extra-terrestrial lifeforms and frightened by the educational “Duck and Cover” films shown in school, Hogarth is nonetheless determined to investigate this strange occurrence, which leads him to discover the Giant attempting to consume a power station. Saved from electrocution by Hogarth, the Giant assumes duties as Hogarth’s protector, who in turn must protect his ginormous friend from prying government eyes…
 
Throughout the course of the film, we come to learn more of the Giant’s backstory and of his defensive system (particularly in the 2015 signature cut which reveals the Giant is a soldier), which when employed, may yield potentially catastrophic results. It turns out that the Giant is armed to the teeth with deadly, futuristic weaponry, hidden beneath his friendly outer shell. Unaware of his world-ending capabilities (he has a case of robotic amnesia), the Giant is mostly pacifistic in nature and only uses his might to protect Hogarth. This behaviour is encouraged by his wise young friend at a pivotal moment – discovering a deer who was shot and killed by hunters, in the woods. The pair mourn for the creature, and Hogarth explains the concept of death to the initially bemused robot, noting that such a beautiful thing was killed using a gun. The Giant learns that the use of guns brings only death and misery, with Hogarth gently reinforcing that peaceful resolutions must be sought over violence. Such wise teaching positively impacts the Giant’s behaviour, but when attacked by government forces, the Giant falls once more into a trance-like state, in which his violent programming threatens to take over completely. In one moment, having destroyed many government vehicles, he eventually comes to stand before Hogarth, poised to vaporise him. But Hogarth petitions him: “It's bad to kill. Guns kill. And you don't have to be a gun. You are what you choose to be. You choose. Choose.” Remarkably, the Giant overrides his programming, returning himself back to his gentler, more loving side. It’s one of the film’s many, beautiful moments, and one which reminded me of how the Bible teaches that humanity, like the Giant, has free will and doesn’t have to obey its own sinful, destructive programming.
​

​​For the Bible teaches that humanity possesses an inherently sinful nature, one which has the power to manifest itself in every part of our lives. Our bodies are “sinful flesh” according to Paul, writing in Romans 8:3 (ESV). We have within us “earthly” desires, which leads us to indulge within “fornication, impurity, passion, evil desire(s), and greed” (Colossians 3:5, NRSV). As a result of this sinful nature, our lives are not exactly our own – we are “enslaved to sin” (Romans 6:6, NRSV) and are destined to live a life in which our sinful nature dictates who we are, what we do and who we become. In fact, our ‘programming’ is so ingrained within us, that we cannot override these evil desires as the Giant did.
 
But there is hope, as the Giant managed to circumvent his programming when he learnt and called to mind the following: We all possess a precious soul within us that must be cared for, and we can make a decision to/be taught to turn away from our destructive ways. How is this possible? The Bible teaches that each of us possesses a soul, an invisible part of our being that lives on for eternity, even after the body experiences death. Hogarth affirms this: if “you have feelings, and you think about things… that means you have a soul”. The Giant, whilst made of metal, is in fact sentient – he has feelings and ponders some of life’s biggest questions with Hogarth. The film, however, is vague on where these souls come from. But the Bible teaches that God is the one who “made our very souls” (Jeremiah 38:16, NKJV) and they are designed to return to Him upon our departing from this earth.
 
However, they can be destined for one of two eternal destinations – Heaven, with God our Father, or Hell, completely separated from our Creator. Sadly, our sinful programming dictates that we are destined to be separated from God’s loving arms – “For the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23, NIV). If we don’t overcome the darkness which pervades from our lives, we will not only experience physical death, but a spiritual one too. But God has made a way for sinful souls to be cleansed, to give us an opportunity to acknowledge our own sinfulness and accept God’s gracious gift of forgiveness, which leads to eternal life. He achieved this in sending His one and only Son to earth, giving Him over as a sacrifice in our place (taking the punishment we deserved and our sin upon Him). He was crucified on the cross as the “…offering for our sin”, so “that we could be made right with God through Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:21, NLT).
​

​So, are we able to learn how to overcome our sinful nature? Hogarth says that we have the ability to choose, quite simply, whether we’re good or bad. In a sense, he’s correct. But the Bible teaches that we cannot redeem ourselves alone. For every stand we make against our sin, we cannot destroy its effects in the present, or the eternal, and hope to be freed from it. No, to be righteous in the sight of God, it requires us to make a choice which starts with Christ. For when we choose to follow Jesus, he gives us a new nature: “…if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” (2 Corinthians 5:17, NIV). And He fills us with his Holy Spirit which gives us the ability to choose to act righteously, instead of giving in to our sinful desires: “…walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.” (Galatians 5:16, NIV). It is only through Jesus doing a work in us, that we may pursue positive change in our lives. For once we have encountered who Christ is, we naturally will not want to do the bad, but only focus upon the good. It is in Christ alone, that our ‘programming’ is completely rewired, and we go on to experience “life…to the full” (John 10:10, NIV) with Him.
 
Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Iron Giant for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Hogarth’s idea of what it means to possess a soul. Think: Is it real? Can it be seen? Do you have one? Or is it for only good people? Prompt them to consider their own soul, asking if they have an idea where their soul will end up, some day. Also, breach the subject of choice with them. Do they believe they have free will, and are they using it for good? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that we have abused our free will and cannot become ‘good’ without Christ’s help. To end, share with them about the unconditional love and forgiveness that is found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Iron Giant is available to rent through Amazon Prime Video and YouTube Movies (in the UK).
​

Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In Review: The Terminal.

Frank Dixon: “…you don't qualify for asylum, refugee status, temporary protective status, humanitarian parole, non-immigration work travel visa… You at this time are simply…"unacceptable".”







​To this day, I continue to maintain that Steven Spielberg’s The Terminal is a Christmas film. Am I able to provide evidence to substantiate my claim? To some extent, yes – even in spite of the film not being explicitly set at Christmas. When commenting upon the reoccurring themes of director Frank Capra’s critically lauded filmography, film author Richard Griffith summarised them thusly: A “messianic innocent ... pits himself against the forces of entrenched greed. His inexperience defeats him strategically, but his gallant integrity in the face of temptation calls for the goodwill of the "little people", and through their combined protest, he triumphs”. Such motifs are present within Capra’s It's a Wonderful Life (1946) and have continued to influence generations of Christmas films after it – from the heart-warming, to the unapologetically whimsical. The Terminal is the collective embodiment of Capra’s favourite subjects, lovingly wrapped up in the spirit of the Christmas season. But it serves a greater purpose to us today, in bringing us far more than festive cheer, but a timely message with strong links to the hope of the Gospel message.

​The Terminal chronicles the tale of one Victor Navorski (Tom Hanks), an Eastern European man who learns that whilst en route to JFK airport, his country entered into a state of political unrest. Following the destabilisation of his homeland’s government and the outbreak of conflict, Victor’s passport and visa are revoked, and he is forced to remain in the airport by the vindictive, self-serving bureaucratic customs officer, Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci). Much to Victor’s bewilderment, Frank informs him that he is stateless and must settle in at the terminal for the duration. Treated harshly by airport officials and terminal staff, without a place to rest his head, and anxious about the uncertain future of his country, Victor struggles to adapt to this highly irregular life within the terminal. But, chance encounters with cheery outsiders such as himself, might just help to see him through…
 
Previous to writing this article, my recollection of The Terminal largely consisted of Hanks’ Victor acting non-plussed for the majority of the film’s runtime. And to some extent, I’m not wrong. Spielberg and his screenwriters know how to write Victor, a fish out of water, into some highly amusing situations – not least when an unassuming passenger asks Victor with a heavy sigh, “Do you ever feel like you’re living in an airport?”. However, I forgot just how much pathos Hanks imbues within the character, particularly in a scene in which Victor realises that his (fictional) nation of Krakozhia is at civil war. Victor, a non-English speaker, cannot understand the news reports he sees on the terminal’s televisions, and when he tearfully begs passers-by to help translate for him, he is only ever brushed aside. To make matters worse, customs officer Frank labels Victor’s visa status “unacceptable”, but we can’t help but feel in the moment, that by Frank’s actions and attitudes, he finds Victor to be just that. These scenes are emotional, not least because they resonate with audiences in 2020, when the plight of refugees is such a disturbing reality. Of course, this is a more sanitised version of so many refugee stories, but there is something so genuinely painful about Victor’s struggle. For the most part, we forget that we’re watching Tom Hanks and instead see a man who is stateless, robbed of his identity and scared. 
​

​In turn, Victor’s refugee story unexpectedly brought to mind the plight of the Israelites, who suffered oppression due to their enslavement within Egypt. Foreigners in a far-off land, the Israelites were treated cruelly as refugees – forced to work as captives in a land they could never call home. Whilst Victor is never enslaved throughout the course of the film (he is inadvertently employed at one point, however), he is oppressed. Those who work within the terminal’s shops insult, laugh or ignore him, either because they don’t take the time to understand Victor, or they’re just ‘too busy’ to acknowledge him as someone who requires basic human rights. Frank’s actions are far worse, however. Throughout the course of the film, he uses condescending language/tone, gives Victor insufficient supplies and makes it his personal vendetta to rid the terminal of Victor, without once trying to understand him. In Exodus 23:9 (NLT), God specifically instructs his people, the Israelites, not to conduct themselves in this way: “You must not oppress foreigners. You know what it’s like to be a foreigner, for you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt.” Following Him liberating the Israelites from their captivity, it was God’s desire for the Israelite people to live their lives as He does, imitating His holy behaviour in every way. They were to be a people whose righteousness clearly set them apart from the evil practices of their time, and ultimately spoke to the righteous way in which God acts – generally and towards humanity.
 
Rather than treat them as outcasts, therefore, God called for the Israelites to treat foreigners or refugees as citizens among them, and to do so with love. In fact, they were instructed to: “Treat them as you would an Israelite, and love them as you love yourselves. Remember that you were once foreigners in the land of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.” (Leviticus 19:34, GNT). But God’s desired treatment of foreigners and refugees went further than that, when God commanded the Israelites to Invite them to be a part of their community. Living by God’s holy Law meant that foreigners were to be included in all aspects of the Jewish community, including provisions for them to be treated equally under the law and to even be included in festivals and celebrations of the community (Deuteronomy 14:28-29, 16:14, 26:11).
​

By the film’s end, we see many unlikely characters come to embody this behaviour for themselves. Even the most hardened of hearts warm to Victor, inviting him into their communities by feeding him and treating him as one of their own. Some, like the Israelites, even understand what it means to be a foreigner, and strive to help Victor at his point of greatest need, which is to liberate him, by helping him to leave the airport. But the Bible later teaches in the New Testament that we, like Victor, need to be met at our point of greatest need – one which goes beyond the physical, to the spiritual: to be liberated from the grip of sin. For the Bible teaches that in the eyes of God, humanity is in “slavery to sin” (Romans 6:18, NLT). When we choose to live our lives apart from God, doing whatever, whenever we choose to do so, we become foreigners and strangers to Him – held in captivity by the darkness we engage with. But God in His great mercy wishes to free us from that place of captivity, and welcome us all, foreigners and strangers alike, into His loving community. But how do we know this? In His word, God promises that we can be saved by putting our complete hope, trust and faith in Jesus: “…it is by God's grace that you have been saved through faith. It is not the result of your own efforts, but God's gift…” (Ephesians 2:8-10, GNT). For whilst we have done wrong in God’s eyes by living for ourselves, He “has shown us how much he loves us” in sending Christ to die for us, taking the punishment that we deserved when He was crucified on the Cross, even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT). Through His perfect sacrifice, Jesus has given us the opportunity, “by the Spirit”, to “put to death your sinful actions”, so that “you will live” (Romans 8:13, GNT) forever in relationship with Him. 
 
So, when we choose to no longer live as foreigners and strangers to God, and come into friendship with Him, He welcomes us into relationship – a perfect friendship which saves us from eternal death in Hell and gives us the gift of eternal life spent in Heaven with Him (“For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.””, Romans 10:13 – ESV). When we put our faith in him, we become part of God’s community. You are “…not foreigners or strangers any longer; you are now citizens together with God's people and members of the family of God.” (Ephesians 2:19, GNT). Such wonderful truths encourage me, as a Christian, in the knowledge that I can and should identify with the idea of not belonging, as the reason why I treat refugees or displaced people without discrimination. For in His perfect, loving kindness, God did not ignore me or my fellow Christians, even though I had done wrong in His eyes. So, we too must share that same kindness with others today.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Terminal for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Victor and his mistreatment by those within the terminal. How does that make you feel as someone who might have missed the foreigner/stranger in need? Prompt them to consider the characters’ lack of compassion – how would they respond to the situation if they worked in the terminal? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that Victor was eventually shown unconditional kindness, despite the terminal and America, not being his home. To end, share with them about the unconditional love and forgiveness that is found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Terminal is available to stream on Netflix (UK).

Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is also advised – this film is rated ‘PG’. For more details on the film’s content, read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In review.
 
Mrs. Fox: “Twelve fox-years ago you made a promise to me . . . you would never steal another chicken . . . and I believed you. Why? Why did you lie to me?”
 
Mr. Fox: “Because I’m a wild animal."





​
​At a lean 87 minutes, Wes Anderson’s stop motion animation Fantastic Mr. Fox (a loose adaptation of the Roald Dahl classic), manages to pull off a rare cinematic feat: offer perceptive and mature reflections upon human nature, which are framed within a ‘children’s film’ concerning mischievous woodland creatures. On paper then, Anderson’s film – featuring a heady mix of autumnal colouring, classic American pop and an obsession with symmetrical framing – just shouldn’t work. Is it a film for adults, children or both? In short, it’s a delight to be shared with everyone, but particularly those who are learning of/attempting to control the affections and desires of the “flesh”, which so often run contrary to God’s laws. But what of our anthropomorphic ‘hero’ Mr. Fox? Can or should he, a self-described “wild animal”, ever hope to overcome his animalistic tendencies in order to live a less self-centred life, for the sake of his family? Or must he simply give in to his seemingly harmless desire to place birds between his teeth?

Upon learning that his wife is pregnant with their first cub, Mr. Fox (George Clooney), a lovable rogue with a penchant for chicken thieving, makes a promise to Mrs. Fox (Meryl Streep): he will find himself an alternative, less dangerous form of employment, to ensure his family’s safety. But twelve years later, Mr. Fox’s role as a columnist leaves him feeling unfulfilled, and he misses the excitement and adrenaline brought on by his former career. Not content with living in a foxhole any longer (it makes him “feel poor”), Mr. Fox purchases a literal tree house, much to the behest of his lawyer (Bill Murray), who forewarns him that the farms of Boggis, Bunce, and Bean are in close proximity to his family home. But Mr. Fox isn’t concerned with those powerful, violent and mean-spirited men - he’s far more interested in devising and carrying out plans to rob them blind. And that he does, which his victims naturally do not take kindly, planning a retaliation for the ages. Is Foxie’s crossing over of the line, whilst exhilarating and highly amusing, worthwhile after all?
 
Fantastic Mr. Fox revels and delights in incorporating tropes of filmmaking into its frivolities. The one which appealed most to me is that of the ‘one last job’ conceit, which has influenced many a filmmaker, from Michael Mann (Heat) to Christopher Nolan (Inception). Here, Mr. Fox decides that he’s going to “secretly do one last big job on the sly”, despite sub-consciously acknowledging the threat it might pose to his family, and his marriage. Whilst his “master plan” is executed without error, leading him to amass an impressive haul, it predictably serves only to enrage the local farmers. So, when the combined workforces of Boggis, Bunce and Bean lead a ridiculous, all-out assault on Fox’s tree house, the crafty fox is forced to not only step into the role of “the quote-unquote fantastic Mr. Fox”, but also confront who he has allowed himself to become.

​​In a rare moment of quiet away from the crazed farmers, Mrs. Fox pulls her husband aside, tearfully demanding that Mr. Fox explain his reasoning for such reckless behaviour. “Because I’m a wild animal”, is his only defence. Earlier, he even struggles to attempt to justify his actions to himself and to a friend, when he says “…how can a fox ever be happy…without a chicken in its teeth?”. For Mr. Fox, he believes that it is within his inbuilt nature to want to steal, which he manipulates to excuse himself of any wrongdoing. In other words, he’s saying that ‘this is who I am’, for which he makes no apology. In a sense, this is permissible - Mr. Fox’s animalistic nature is what his creator wrote into his very being. However, this tale is allegorical, designed to convey morals to its human viewers. The animals are therefore representatives of us – humans, who unlike animals, can and do know better. So, whilst we might feel as if we are bound to our ‘human nature’, does that necessarily mean that we should act upon our every impulse?
 
According to the Bible, Mr. Fox’s misguided actions (and by extension, our own) are not always permissible – even if we feel that we were born a certain way or are doing something for the sake of our own perceived happiness. For whilst anyone can be born with a disposition towards something, and genuinely feel as if that is ‘who they are’, we aren’t always justified in the pursuit of that. For example, what if acting upon such a disposition hurts ourselves, or those we love? The Bible teaches that humanity has ultimately been born with a disposition to sin, even particular mistakes such as theft - made clear in the case of Mr. Fox, who maintains that his nature defines who he is. This is because everyone has been born with a sinful nature, which we ourselves inherited: Sin “…came into the world through one man (Adam), and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned…” (Romans 5:12, NRSV). In Psalm 51 (ICB), we even read King David acknowledging this sinful state within himself: “I was brought into this world in sin. In sin my mother gave birth to me.”. From birth onwards, therefore, the Bible teaches that we all become “…people (who) have sinned and are (therefore) not good enough for God’s glory.” (Romans 3:23, ICB).
​

Learning that we are born with a disposition to sin, might be wrongly interpreted by Mr. Fox and humanity by and large, as a ‘get out of jail free’ card. However, the Bible teaches that just because we are fallen in nature, it doesn’t mean that we must act upon our every whim. For God hasn’t created us to be sinners – those who do whatever they like, not thinking of the consequences. In fact, the Bible teaches that just because “something is technically legal”, it “doesn’t mean that it’s spiritually appropriate” for us to engage with (1 Corinthians 6:12, MSG). But each of us, in our own ways, have chosen to give in to our sinful nature: “We all have wandered away like sheep. Each of us has gone his own (sinful) way.” (Isaiah 53:6, ICB). And in so doing, all that we receive following our life here on earth, are “…the wages of sin (which) is death” – that which leads us to spend eternity in separation from God in hell (Romans 3:23, NLT).
 
However, God teaches through His Word the Bible, that we don’t have to conform ourselves to our sinful nature. For by doing so, we will not receive the happiness or satisfaction which we or Mr. Fox seek. Just as in Fantastic Mr. Fox, all that our sin will bring upon us is disaster – both literally and spiritually, both here and in eternity. Rather, we need not act upon our sinful desires, which hurt ourselves and have the potential to hurt those around us. All that we must do, in order to “have life, and have it to the full” (John 10:10, NIV), just as Mr. Fox so desperately seeks, is come to Jesus. For whilst we have done wrong in God’s eyes by living for ourselves, He “has shown us how much he loves us” in sending Christ to die for us, taking the punishment that we deserved, even “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8, GNT). Through His perfect sacrifice on the Cross, Jesus has given us the opportunity, “by the Spirit”, for “you put to death your sinful actions”, so that “you will live” (Romans 8:13, GNT) forever in relationship with Him. In Christ alone, even a sinful, ‘wild animal’ such as Mr. Fox can learn to put to death “put to death…the earthly desires at work in” him (Colossians 3:5, GNT), to then truly live the life fantastic.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch Fantastic Mr. Fox for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Mr. Fox and his pursuit of happiness – is it just harmless fun, or is it reckless, and perhaps even dangerous? Prompt them to consider the cost of Mr. Fox’s actions too – do they feel that what he accomplished was worth all of that, regardless of the consequences? Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, mentioning the fact that Mr. Fox’s selfish pursuit of happiness only brought Him pain and anguish. To end, share with them about the complete happiness and fulfilment found in a relationship with Christ.

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, as I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
Fantastic Mr. Fox is available to stream on Amazon Prime (UK).
 

​​Please note: The following text contains spoilers. Viewer discretion is
also advised – this film is rated ‘12’. For more details on the film’s content,
read Focus On The Family’s Plugged In review.
 
It’s been thirteen years since the release of Rob Reiner’s comedy-drama,
The Bucket List – an unapologetically schmaltzy studio film which draws upon
the legendary acting talents of two men, who at the time, were
gracefully entering into their twilight years. You know, typically breezy
Sunday afternoon programming. But when viewed for the first time in the
very serious year of 2020, the film’s aura of oversentimentality seems
excessive, and not at all sweet. And yet somehow in spite of itself, The Bucket
List succeeds in telling an otherwise compelling story – especially
when confronting it’s viewers with weighty questions, such as: If faced with
the imminent, inevitability of your death, what would you choose to do with
​the time that is left to you?

​And for a dour year such as this, in which many people have been forced to confront their own fragile mortality when faced with a deadly virus, The Bucket List seems timely, especially in prompting us to reconsider what we value most in life, and whether or not we’re in dire need of re-examining it all-together, before we kick the proverbial bucket… 

Jack Nicholson plays Edward Cole, a corporate billionaire who one might describe as the 21st century equivalent of Ebenezer Scrooge – a ruthless businessman with little regard for people, but a strong desire to protect his financial assets, regardless of the pain he inflicts upon others. So much so, in fact, that within the hospitals owned and operated by Edward, his own regulations state that all rooms are double occupancy for the sake of cost-efficiency. This is all well and good, until Edward is unexpectedly diagnosed with cancer, and informed that he cannot have his own private room but must learn to share – much to his annoyance. Enter Carter Chambers (Morgan Freeman), Edward’s roommate and an average Joe mechanic, who cares very little for his roomie’s impolite behaviour and is perfectly content with living a ‘less is more’ lifestyle. As the two undergo various treatments, an unlikely bond slowly forms between them. But sadly, despite the best efforts of their medical teams, the pair are given just a short time to live. Rather than accept defeat, however, Carter and Edward write a list containing all of the things they have ever wanted to do before they die and embark upon an adventure of a lifetime.
 
What follows is a collection of heart-warming sequences which regularly switch back and forth in genre, from the comic road movie to a spiritual journey. As their bond of friendship deepens between them, so does their trust in one another, which leads to the two men sharing poignant conversations about faith, joy, what happens after we die, and even the existence of God. There isn’t a great deal of depth to their religious/philosophical musings, but it does lead both Edward and Carter to contemplate what truly matters most to them in life. For at first, their bucket project stems from a largely self-centred desire to gift experiences to themselves, which they feel, for one reason or another, they deserve to enjoy. They go skydiving, visit the Taj Mahal, fly over the North Pole, ride motorcycles on the Great Wall of China and more… But still, in spite of the many escapades which they share with one another, something still seems to be missing in their lives. And in the quieter moments between them, the men share vulnerable tête-à-têtes regarding their flaws and regrets, subsequently revealing what they’re missing in life. For example, whilst sat atop the Great Pyramid, Carter reveals a loss of love for his wife, and Edward confesses his misguided actions which led to becoming estranged from his only daughter. The trip, whilst powerful and awe-inspiring, still can’t fill the respective voids within their life, which brings them to search for meaning and joy. 
​

In one moment, Carter asks Edward the following two questions, which Egyptian Gods supposedly would ask people: (1) Have you found joy in your life? (2) Has your life brought joy to others? If answering honestly, neither man could answer yes to both questions. Their quest is one to find joy in the world, but following the trip, Edward is left feeling alone (literally and figuratively), whilst Carter is surrounded by more important things in life which bring him joy, such as family.
 
Both men experience the joy that comes from the world, particularly Edward, who indulges in the “the fleeting pleasures of sin” (Hebrews 11:25, NLT) such as when he invites escorts to his home, but only breaks down weeping in his luxury high-rise suite, when he realises just how worthless the experience actually is. Edward and Carter’s joy (whilst the source of the latter’s is more positive overall) is still temporary no matter what they do, as health issues or the breakdown of relationships continue to rob them of their joy, in preparing for their deaths.  

King Solomon, much like Edward and Carter, attempted to find joy and happiness in the things of this world, saying: “I said to myself, "Come now, I will test you with pleasure to find out what is good." But that also proved to be meaningless… What does pleasure accomplish?” (Ecclesiastes 2:1-2, NIV). Solomon realised that the joy of the world is unfulfilling, but that the joy which the Lord brings is rich, abundant and sustains us in a way that this world never could. Today, Christians have access to that very same joy, made possible by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the Cross. For we were once sinners, robbed of joy and “life in all its fullness” by Satan, the “thief” who came to “kill and destroy” (John 10:10, ICB) by leading us into sin. But Jesus was sent by His Father God, to free us of the grip that sin had upon our lives, by taking our sin upon himself and destroying its power forever, when He died and rose again three days later. Through His sacrifice on the Cross, He made a way for us to be able to ask for forgiveness, become saved from eternal death apart from God, and experience a sense of joy from the Lord which can be readily present, even as we face difficulties in our life. For when we believe and know in our hearts that we are children of God, knowing that we are heirs to “a priceless inheritance” (1 Peter 1:4, NLT) which is the gift of eternal life, we can be secure in the joy of salvation He brings, not looking for such fulfilment elsewhere. Edward and Carter might eventually find their joy in family and friends, but such joy which only the Lord brings, gives us a hope for eternity – something which these two men do not have, and the filmmakers do not believe in. But when we come to God and receive His love, joy, hope and peace, we need not look elsewhere.

Challenge:
 
Why not prayerfully invite a friend or family member who doesn’t yet know Jesus, to watch The Bucket List for themselves? Use the film’s themes to ask them what they thought of the film, if they spotted any links to Christianity and what they might think of the Gospel’s response to this subject.

If you feel able to, ask them what they think about Edward's outlook on life - do they think that we can experience fullness of joy in the everyday, or do we need to look elsewhere? What about for Carter, do they think that family's enough to give us joy?  Later, if they're open to hearing it, take an opportunity to share the hope of the Gospel message with them, majoring on the complete joy of salvation which a relationship with Jesus brings to us. 

Prior to watching the film for yourself, however, take a moment to pray that God would speak to you through the film. If you feel comfortable, pray this prayer over all of your future, film-watching experiences:
 
Dear Lord, As I watch this film, I ask that you would be present here with me. Highlight to me anything within it that is honourable, anything that can be used in conversation for your Kingdom purposes. Amen.
 
The Bucket List is available to stream on Amazon Prime (UK)